CVE-2026-5978
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in Totolink A7100RU 7.4cu.2313_b20191024. Affected is the function setWiFiAclRules of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. The manipulation of the argument mode leads to os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in Totolink A7100RU router firmware 7.4cu.2313_b20191024. The setWiFiAclRules function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi does not properly sanitize the mode parameter, allowing remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary OS commands on the device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the router admin web interface and check the status or system info page for the model name, or physically inspect the device label.Affected if The device is not a Totolink A7100RU router.
-
Check the firmware versionIn the router admin interface, navigate to System > Firmware Upgrade or Status page and record the firmware version string displayed.Affected if The firmware version is 7.4cu.2313_b20191024.
-
Verify the CGI endpoint existsSend an HTTP request to http://[router-ip]/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi and check for a valid response (any response indicates the endpoint is present).Affected if The endpoint returns any HTTP response, confirming cstecgi.cgi is accessible.
-
Confirm WiFi ACL functionality is exposedCheck the router admin interface for WiFi settings > WiFi ACL (Access Control List) or similar wireless security configuration section. If the feature exists and is accessible in the UI, the vulnerable function can be triggered.Affected if WiFi ACL feature is present and accessible in the router admin interface.
A user is affected if they have a Totolink A7100RU router running firmware version 7.4cu.2313_b20191024 with the /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi endpoint accessible and WiFi ACL feature enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware patch if available; otherwise restrict administrative interface access to trusted networks only or replace the device.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5978 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5978 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data