CVE-2026-6001
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAuthorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in ABIS Technology Ltd. Co. BAPSİS allows Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers. This issue affects BAPSİS: before v.202604152042.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceABIS Technology Ltd. BAPSİS contains an authorization bypass vulnerability where the application trusts user-controlled keys or identifiers without proper validation. Attackers can manipulate these identifiers to gain unauthorized access to functionality or data that should be restricted, exploiting the application's trust in client-supplied values for authorization decisions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine BAPSİS installed versionLocate the BAPSİS application installation directory and check version information in version files, About dialog, or system configuration. Common locations include the installation root folder, config/settings files, or the application's help/about section.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 202604152042 (any version before the April 15, 2026 update).
-
Identify user-supplied identifier usageReview application code, API endpoints, or configuration to identify places where the application accepts identifiers (such as user IDs, record IDs, session tokens, or object references) from client requests.Affected if The application processes any user-supplied identifiers (GET/POST parameters, headers, cookies) for authorization decisions.
-
Audit authorization logic for client-trustExamine the server-side authorization code to verify whether user-supplied identifiers are validated against server-side session data or trusted without re-verification.Affected if Authorization checks rely on client-supplied identifiers without server-side validation or use client data as the sole basis for access decisions.
-
Check protected resource access patternsTest or review access to restricted functionality (admin panels, data retrieval endpoints, modification operations) by manipulating identifier values in requests.Affected if Manipulating identifier values in requests allows access to resources or functions outside the user's legitimate scope.
You are affected if running any BAPSİS version before 202604152042 and the application uses user-supplied identifiers for authorization without server-side validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to BAPSİS version 202604152042 or later. Until then, implement strict server-side validation of all user-supplied identifiers and enforce proper authorization checks on every protected resource and operation.
BAPSİS v.202604152042 or later
- Contact ABIS Technology Ltd. Co. to obtain the patched version v.202604152042 or later of BAPSİS
- Verify the current installed version of BAPSİS by checking the application about or version information
- Back up the current BAPSİS configuration and database before performing any upgrade
- Obtain the upgrade package from the official vendor (ABIS Technology Ltd. Co.) or authorized distribution channel
- Follow the vendor-provided upgrade instructions to install version 202604152042 or newer
- After upgrading, verify that the IDOR vulnerability is resolved by testing authorization controls
- Confirm that normal BAPSİS functionality remains intact after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6001 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6001 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data