CVE-2026-60094
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVinchin Backup & Recovery through 9.0.0.86562 contains a heap buffer overflow vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to cause process crash or memory corruption by sending a malformed TCP packet with an unchecked body_len field to the agentlink_server service. Attackers can craft a malicious packet that passes an attacker-controlled length directly to recv(), triggering a heap overflow of up to approximately 4 GiB and resulting in process crash or potential memory corruption.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVinchin Backup & Recovery agentlink_server service contains a heap buffer overflow where an unchecked body_len field from a malformed TCP packet is passed directly to recv(), allowing attackers to trigger heap overflows of up to approximately 4 GiB, causing process crash or potential memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Vinchin Backup & Recovery installation and versionLocate the Vinchin installation directory and check the product version file, or run: vinchin --version or check the About section in the management consoleAffected if The installed version falls within the vulnerable version range (compare your version to the vendor's official vulnerability advisory)
-
Confirm agentlink_server service is runningCheck if the agentlink_server process is active: on Windows, open Services and look for 'Vinchin AgentLink Server' or run 'sc query agentlink_server'; on Linux, run 'ps aux | grep agentlink_server' or 'systemctl status vinchin-agentlink'Affected if The agentlink_server service is running and exposed to network traffic
-
Check network exposure of agentlink_serverIdentify which port agentlink_server listens on (typically TCP port 10001 or as configured), then check listening status using 'netstat -an | grep <port>' or 'ss -tlnp | grep <port>'Affected if The service is bound to a network interface accessible to attackers (0.0.0.0 or external IP rather than 127.0.0.1/localhost)
-
Inspect service configuration for security settingsExamine the agentlink_server configuration file (typically in the Vinchin config directory) for any authentication, encryption, or access control settings related to TCP packet handlingAffected if No packet validation or body_len bounds checking is configured (the vulnerability exists regardless of config, but this confirms exposure)
You are affected if Vinchin Backup & Recovery with a vulnerable version is installed, the agentlink_server service is running, and it is network-accessible to receive malformed TCP packets with an unchecked body_len field.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement strict validation of the body_len field before passing it to recv(), including bounds checking against maximum allowed size and ensuring the length is within reasonable limits for the available buffer allocation.
Vinchin Backup & Recovery version newer than 9.0.0.86562 (contact vendor for exact fixed release)
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Vinchin Backup & Recovery by checking the agentlink_server service or the product UI
- 2. Contact Vinchin support or check the official Vinchin website (www.vinchin.com) for the latest stable release that addresses this vulnerability
- 3. Before upgrading, ensure you have a complete backup of the Vinchin configuration and data
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- 5. Download the latest Vinchin Backup & Recovery version from the official vendor website or official distribution channels
- 6. Follow Vinchin's official upgrade documentation to install the update
- 7. After upgrade, verify the agentlink_server service is running correctly
- 8. Test basic backup and recovery operations to confirm system functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-60094 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-60094 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data