CVE-2026-60119
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHi.Events before 1.11.0 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers with event creation or edit permissions to inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript by embedding a malicious event title containing the </script> sequence, which is not escaped by JSON.stringify() when embedded in inline script tags. Attackers can craft an event title that breaks out of the script context in the application/ld+json structured data block or server-side rehydrated state, causing the payload to execute in the browser of any user who views the public event page, including unauthenticated visitors and authenticated administrators.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHi.Events before 1.11.0 allows authenticated users with event creation/edit permissions to inject XSS via malicious event titles containing the </script> sequence. The vulnerability exists because event titles are not properly escaped when embedded in inline script tags using JSON.stringify(), allowing attackers to break out of the script context in application/ld+json structured data or server-side rehydrated state. This stored XSS executes in browsers of anyone viewing the public event page, including unauthenticated visitors and administrators.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Hi.Events installationLocate the Hi.Events application in your environment. Check for the main application directory or container image. Look for files such as package.json, composer.json, or the main application entry point.Affected if Hi.Events is present in your environment
-
Determine installed Hi.Events versionCheck the version file or application metadata. Common locations: package.json (Node.js), composer.json (PHP), version.php, or the admin dashboard if accessible. Compare the version number to the affected range (before 1.11.0).Affected if The installed version is 1.10.x or earlier, or any version below 1.11.0
-
Verify event creation or editing capability existsConfirm that the application has event management functionality enabled. This may involve checking user roles, permissions configuration, or the presence of event creation forms in the application's route structure.Affected if Authenticated users can create new events or edit existing events in the system
-
Confirm public event pages are accessibleVerify that the application exposes public-facing event pages. Check the application's routing configuration or attempt to access a public event URL pattern (commonly /event/{slug} or /events/{id}).Affected if Public event pages are accessible to unauthenticated visitors, allowing stored XSS to execute in their browsers
Your environment is affected if Hi.Events version is below 1.11.0 and the application permits authenticated users to create or edit events, as the injected script will execute on public event pages viewed by anyone.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Hi.Events version 1.11.0 or later, which should include proper escaping of event titles in inline script contexts; alternatively, implement context-aware output encoding for event titles in JSON.stringify() embedded scripts and ensure application/ld+json data properly escapes special characters.
Hi.Events 1.11.0 or later
- Upgrade Hi.Events to version 1.11.0 or later to resolve the XSS vulnerability
- After upgrading, verify that event titles are properly escaped when rendered in inline script tags and application/ld+json structured data
- Review existing events for any malicious titles containing </script> or similar injection attempts
- Ensure proper input validation and output encoding is maintained for all user-generated content
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-60119 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-60119 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data