CVE-2026-6030
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in itsourcecode Construction Management System 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /del1.php. This manipulation of the argument toolname causes sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Construction Management System 1.0 in the /del1.php file. The 'toolname' parameter is vulnerable to SQL injection, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands by manipulating the input.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm application identity and versionInspect the application source code, headers, or any version files (such as README, about page, or meta tags) to verify the system is itsourcecode Construction Management System version 1.0Affected if The installed application is itsourcecode Construction Management System version 1.0
-
Verify del1.php file existsCheck the web server document root for the presence of the file /del1.php or search the application source code directory structure for this fileAffected if The del1.php file exists in the application
-
Confirm toolname parameter acceptanceReview the del1.php source code to verify it accepts a 'toolname' parameter via GET or POST requestAffected if The del1.php script accepts and processes a toolname parameter from user input
-
Check database query implementationExamine the del1.php source code, particularly the database query section handling the toolname parameter, to determine if parameterized queries (prepared statements) are used or if the parameter is concatenated directly into SQL stringsAffected if The toolname parameter is directly interpolated into SQL queries without using prepared statements or input sanitization
The system is affected if it runs itsourcecode Construction Management System 1.0 with the del1.php file present and the toolname parameter is processed through unparameterized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database operations involving the toolname parameter, or apply input validation and sanitization. Contact vendor for official patch.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6030 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6030 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data