CVE-2026-6038
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in code-projects Vehicle Showroom Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /util/RegisterCustomerFunction.php. Such manipulation of the argument BRANCH_ID leads to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Vehicle Showroom Management System 1.0's /util/RegisterCustomerFunction.php. The BRANCH_ID parameter is not properly sanitized before use in SQL queries, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the Vehicle Showroom Management System versionCheck your installed version of the software. This vulnerability affects version 1.0. Locate the version indicator in your installation (typically in an about page, composer.json, or version file in the application root).Affected if The installed version is 1.0 or earlier
-
Confirm the affected file existsVerify that the file /util/RegisterCustomerFunction.php exists in your web application's directory structure.Affected if The file /util/RegisterCustomerFunction.php is present in the application
-
Examine the BRANCH_ID parameter handling in RegisterCustomerFunction.phpOpen /util/RegisterCustomerFunction.php and search for code that handles the BRANCH_ID parameter. Look for SQL queries that directly incorporate this parameter without using prepared statements or parameterized queries.Affected if The BRANCH_ID parameter is used in SQL queries without proper sanitization or prepared statements
-
Determine if the application is network-accessibleCheck whether the Vehicle Showroom Management System web interface is exposed to network access (internal or external). Attempt to access the /util/RegisterCustomerFunction.php endpoint via HTTP/HTTPS.Affected if The application is accessible over a network and the vulnerable endpoint can be reached
The environment is affected if running Vehicle Showroom Management System version 1.0 with the vulnerable RegisterCustomerFunction.php file present and network-accessible, where the BRANCH_ID parameter is used directly in SQL queries without prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database operations involving the BRANCH_ID parameter. Apply input validation and output encoding as defense-in-depth measures.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6038 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6038 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data