CVE-2026-6062
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMattermost versions 11.7.x <= 11.7.0, 11.6.x <= 11.6.2, 11.5.x <= 11.5.5, 10.11.x <= 10.11.17 Fail to validate channel ownership of an existing subscription before applying edits which allows an authenticated attacker to hijack subscriptions from channels they have no access to via a crafted PUT request to the subscription edit endpoint.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00650
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Mattermost's subscription edit endpoint. The application fails to validate channel ownership before applying edits to subscriptions, allowing authenticated attackers to craft PUT requests that hijack subscriptions from channels they have no access to.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.11.0, < 10.11.18>= 11.5.0, < 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, < 11.6.3>= 11.7.0, < 11.7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Mattermost Server versionRun 'mattermost version' or inspect the /opt/mattermost/version file, or check the system information in the Mattermost System Console under About > MattermostAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 10.11.0 through 10.11.17, 11.5.0 through 11.5.5, 11.6.0 through 11.6.2, or 11.7.0
-
Verify subscription edit API exposureReview API endpoint documentation or server logs for access to /api/v4/subscriptions endpoints, specifically PUT requests that modify subscription configurationsAffected if The subscription edit endpoint is exposed and accessible to authenticated users
-
Inspect server logs for suspicious subscription modificationsSearch Mattermost server logs (typically in /var/log/mattermost or via the logging API) for PUT requests to subscription endpoints where the requesting user lacks channel membership or channel accessAffected if Logs show subscription modification attempts from users on channels they do not have access to
-
Audit subscription ownership in databaseQuery the database (PostgreSQL or MySQL) for subscriptions where the UserId does not match a member of the ChannelId, or compare subscription records against channel membership tablesAffected if Database contains subscription records linking users to channels they are not members of
You are affected if your Mattermost Server version is 10.11.0-10.11.17, 11.5.0-11.5.5, 11.6.0-11.6.2, or 11.7.0 AND your logs or database show unauthorized subscription modifications from users accessing channels they do not belong to.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.11.1811.5.611.6.3
Upgrade to Mattermost versions later than 11.7.0, 11.6.2, 11.5.5, and 10.11.17 as specified in MMSA-2026-00650.
10.11.18 (for 10.11.x), 11.5.6 (for 11.5.x), 11.6.3 (for 11.6.x), or 11.7.1 (for 11.7.x)
- 1. Identify current Mattermost Server version by checking the system console or running 'mattermost version' command
- 2. Determine which version branch you are currently on (10.11.x, 11.5.x, 11.6.x, or 11.7.x)
- 3. For 10.11.x branch: upgrade to version 10.11.18 or later
- 4. For 11.5.x branch: upgrade to version 11.5.6 or later
- 5. For 11.6.x branch: upgrade to version 11.6.3 or later
- 6. For 11.7.x branch: upgrade to version 11.7.1 or later
- 7. Follow Mattermost upgrade documentation to apply the update
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful and the server is functioning normally
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,568.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6062 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6062 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data