CVE-2026-6115
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in Totolink A7100RU 7.4cu.2313_b20191024. This affects the function setAppCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument enable can lead to os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in Totolink A7100RU router firmware 7.4cu.2313_b20191024. The setAppCfg function in the CGI handler (/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi) fails to sanitize the 'enable' argument, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelCheck the device label or admin interface for the model name (Totolink A7100RU)Affected if Device is not a Totolink A7100RU router (not affected)
-
Check firmware versionAccess the router admin panel (typically at 192.168.0.1) and look under System Status or Firmware Upgrade to find the installed firmware version; compare to 7.4cu.2313_b20191024Affected if Firmware version matches or predates 7.4cu.2313_b20191024
-
Verify CGI binary existsAttempt to access http://<router-ip>/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi via HTTP GET or POST - this endpoint should exist on vulnerable firmwareAffected if The cstecgi.cgi endpoint responds (vulnerable binary is present)
-
Confirm remote management is enabledIn the router admin panel, check under Advanced or Security settings for 'Remote Management', 'Web Management', or 'TR-069' settings - determine if remote access from WAN is enabledAffected if Remote management/WAN access to the web interface is enabled (vulnerability is exploitable remotely)
-
Check WAN exposureFrom an external network (not LAN), attempt to reach the router's public IP on port 80/443, or check router firewall rules to see if WAN HTTP/HTTPS ports are openAffected if The router admin interface is exposed to the internet or untrusted networks
The device is affected if it is a Totolink A7100RU running firmware 7.4cu.2313_b20191024 or earlier, with the cstecgi.cgi endpoint present and remote management exposed to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware patch if available; otherwise restrict network access to the CGI interface via firewall rules or disable the affected service to reduce exposure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6115 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6115 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data