CVE-2026-6119
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in AstrBotDevs AstrBot up to 4.22.1. The affected element is the function post_data.get of the component API Endpoint. Such manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceServer-side request forgery (SSRF) in AstrBot's API endpoint, specifically in the post_data.get function, allowing remote attackers to manipulate the server into making arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if AstrBot is installedLocate AstrBot installation directories or check running processes for astrbot or similar service namesAffected if AstrBot is present and running in the environment
-
Locate the post_data.get API endpointSearch for source code files containing 'post_data.get' function definition or API route handlers related to HTTP request functionalityAffected if The post_data.get function exists in the codebase and is exposed via an API endpoint
-
Check API accessibilityDetermine if the API endpoint accepting external requests is reachable from untrusted networks or the internetAffected if The vulnerable endpoint is accessible without proper authentication or network restrictions
-
Verify URL validation is absent or weakInspect the code handling the post_data.get function to determine if URL parameters are validated against an allowlist or if internal network destinations are blockedAffected if No strict URL validation or allowlist is implemented on the post_data.get endpoint, allowing arbitrary URL manipulation
-
Test for internal network accessIf the endpoint is accessible, attempt to make a request to an internal resource (e.g., localhost or internal IP) using the post_data.get parameter to confirm the SSRF behaviorAffected if The server can be induced to make HTTP requests to internal resources through the vulnerable endpoint
The environment is affected if AstrBot is running with the post_data.get API endpoint exposed and lacking proper URL validation, allowing arbitrary HTTP requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict or disable the vulnerable post_data.get API function and implement strict allowlist-based URL validation with input sanitization to prevent requests to internal network resources.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6119 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6119 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data