Missing AuthenticationWeakness · CWE-306

CVE-2026-61344

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 6 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Superior Court of California Hearing Reminder Service at https://www.hrs.courts.ca.gov exposes an API endpoint that returns court reminder records containing potentially sensitive information without authentication.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Superior Court of California Hearing Reminder Service (hrs.courts.ca.gov) contains an API endpoint that returns court reminder records with potentially sensitive information without requiring any authentication. This allows any unauthenticated user to access confidential court-related data through the exposed API.

MitigationImplement authentication and authorization controls on the API endpoint to ensure only authorized users can access court reminder records, and conduct an audit to identify any other unprotected endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if you host the hearing reminder service
    Check your environment for any service running on hrs.courts.ca.gov or any court hearing reminder service with API functionality. Search your web server logs for requests to hrs.courts.ca.gov and check your DNS records for this hostname.
    Affected if Your organization hosts or maintains the hearing reminder service at hrs.courts.ca.gov or a similar court hearing reminder system.
  2. Locate the API endpoint
    Review your application routing configuration, API documentation, or web server logs to identify the API endpoint path that serves court reminder records. Common patterns include /api/reminders, /api/hearings, or similar REST endpoints.
    Affected if An API endpoint exists that serves court reminder data.
  3. Test endpoint without authentication
    Send an HTTP GET request to the identified API endpoint using a tool like curl or a browser (e.g., curl -v https://[host]/api/reminders) without including any authentication headers, cookies, or API keys.
    Affected if The endpoint returns HTTP 200 OK and includes court reminder data without requiring any credentials.
  4. Verify sensitive data exposure
    Examine the API response payload for personally identifiable information (PII) such as case numbers, party names, hearing dates, or other confidential court-related data.
    Affected if The response contains sensitive court records that should require authorization to access.
  5. Check for other unprotected endpoints
    Review your API documentation or perform endpoint enumeration (checking common API paths like /api/v1/, /api/users, /api/cases) to identify any other endpoints that may lack authentication controls.
    Affected if Additional API endpoints are accessible without authentication.

You are affected if your organization hosts the hearing reminder service and its API endpoint returns court reminder records without requiring any authentication credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement authentication and authorization controls on the API endpoint to ensure only authorized users can access court reminder records, and conduct an audit to identify any other unprotected endpoints.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-61344 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-61344 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data