CVE-2026-61426
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPraisonAI before 1.7.3 contains an insecure default configuration that binds to all interfaces with no API key requirement and wildcard CORS. Unauthenticated attackers can call GET /api/agents to read agent instructions and system prompts, or POST /api/chat to invoke agents without authentication.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePraisonAI before version 1.7.3 ships with an insecure default configuration that binds the web service to all network interfaces (0.0.0.0) without requiring API key authentication and with wildcard CORS headers enabled. This allows any unauthenticated remote attacker to access GET /api/agents (reading sensitive agent instructions and system prompts) and POST /api/chat (executing agent actions) without any credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed PraisonAI versionRun 'pip show praisonai' or check your package manager to identify the installed version numberAffected if Version is before 1.7.3
-
Verify service binding configurationInspect the startup configuration, environment variables, or config file for the host binding setting. Look for '0.0.0.0' or 'bind' settingsAffected if Service is bound to 0.0.0.0 (all network interfaces) instead of localhost or a specific trusted IP
-
Confirm API key authentication is enforcedReview your configuration files and API endpoint code to verify that authentication is required for /api/agents and /api/chat endpointsAffected if No API key or authentication mechanism is configured or enforced on these endpoints
-
Inspect CORS policy configurationExamine your CORS configuration settings for allowed originsAffected if CORS is set to allow wildcard (*) or includes untrusted origins
You are affected if running PraisonAI version before 1.7.3 with default configuration (bound to 0.0.0.0, no API key auth, and wildcard CORS), as this exposes agent instructions and chat execution to unauthenticated remote attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to PraisonAI 1.7.3 or later, configure the service to bind only to localhost or trusted networks, enable and enforce API key authentication, and restrict CORS to specific trusted origins.
1.7.3 or later
- Upgrade PraisonAI to version 1.7.3 or later to remediate the insecure default configuration vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-61426 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-61426 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data