CVE-2026-61858
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 has a policy bypass vulnerability in its APNG encoder and external delegate handling. The encoder lacks proper validation checks that enforce the configured security policies, allowing attackers to write files to paths that should be restricted by those policies. This bypass occurs specifically during the APNG encoding process where policy restrictions are not correctly applied.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.9.13-51>= 7.0.0-0, < 7.1.2-26CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed ImageMagick versionRun 'convert --version' or 'magick --version' on the command line to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if The version shown is less than 6.9.13-51, or is 7.0.0-0 through 7.1.2-25 (including any 7.0.x or 7.1.x variants before 7.1.2-26)
-
Verify APNG format support is enabledRun 'convert -list format' and look for APNG in the output, or attempt a simple APNG read/write operation with 'convert input.png output.apng' to confirm APNG encoding capability existsAffected if APNG format support is listed as Read/Write or enabled in the format list
-
Locate and inspect the security policy configuration fileFind policy.xml in /etc/ImageMagick-6/, /etc/ImageMagick-7/, or /etc/ImageMagick/ (path varies by installation), then examine its contents for any path or file-related restrictionsAffected if A policy.xml file exists and contains <policy> entries that restrict file write operations or specific directory paths (the bypass allows writing beyond these restrictions)
-
Test whether APNG encoding can write to a restricted locationIf policy.xml restricts certain paths (such as '/*' or specific directories), attempt to encode an image to APNG format and write to a path that should be blocked by policy (e.g., a path outside allowed directories)Affected if The APNG encoder successfully writes a file to a location that the policy.xml should have denied
You are affected if your ImageMagick version is in the vulnerable range (below 6.9.13-51 or between 7.0.0-0 and 7.1.2-25) AND you have APNG encoding enabled AND your security policies are configured to restrict file writes that the APNG encoder can now bypass.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.9.13-517.1.2-26
Upgrade ImageMagick to version 7.1.2-26 or later which contains the proper validation checks. Additionally, review and restrict external delegate configurations in policy.xml to minimize the attack surface until the upgrade is applied.
7.1.2-26 (or 6.9.13-51 for the 6.x branch)
- Identify the current ImageMagick version using 'convert --version' or 'magick --version'
- If using the 7.x branch, upgrade to version 7.1.2-26 or later using your system's package manager (e.g., 'apt-get install imagemagick', 'yum update ImageMagick', or 'brew upgrade imagemagick')
- If using the 6.x branch, upgrade to version 6.9.13-51 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by running 'convert --version' or 'magick --version' and confirming the version number meets the fixed release criteria
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-61858 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-61858 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data