CVE-2026-6191
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Construction Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /equipments.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument Name can lead to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Construction Management System 1.0 in the /equipments.php file where the 'Name' parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed applicationLook for itsourcecode Construction Management System in your web server's document root or application directory. Check for the presence of equipments.php file.Affected if The application is itsourcecode Construction Management System and the equipments.php file exists.
-
Confirm the application versionCheck the application's about page, header files, or version configuration for the exact version number. Compare against version 1.0.Affected if The installed version is 1.0 or matches the affected version range for this product.
-
Locate the vulnerable PHP fileNavigate to the web root and locate the /equipments.php file. Common paths include /var/www/html/ or the application's document root directory.Affected if The file /equipments.php exists in the web-accessible directory.
-
Verify the Name parameter is processedExamine the equipments.php source code or test the endpoint by submitting a request to the page with a Name parameter. Check if the application accepts and processes user input via the Name field.Affected if The Name parameter is accepted as user input and used in SQL queries without sanitization.
-
Check for input validation on the Name parameterReview the application's source code around the Name parameter handling in equipments.php. Look for sanitization functions, prepared statements, or input validation logic.Affected if No sanitization, parameterized queries, or prepared statements are found for the Name parameter in the SQL query logic.
The environment is affected if itsourcecode Construction Management System version 1.0 is installed, the equipments.php file exists, and the Name parameter accepts user input without sanitization or parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements, implement strict input validation on the Name parameter, and apply the principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6191 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6191 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data