Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2026-61956

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges 5 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in hamsalam ووسلام &#8211; همگام سازی ووکامرس و باسلام sync-basalam allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects ووسلام &#8211; همگام سازی ووکامرس و باسلام: from n/a through <= 1.9.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Basalam-WooCommerce sync plugin allows attackers to trick authenticated administrators or users into executing unintended actions (such as modifying sync settings or triggering orders) by forcing their browser to send malicious requests.

MitigationImplement WordPress nonces (anti-CSRF tokens) in all forms and AJAX endpoints within the plugin, and validate these nonces server-side before processing any state-changing requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Basalam-WooCommerce plugin is installed
    Access WordPress admin panel, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, or inspect the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder containing 'basalam' and 'woocommerce' in the name
    Affected if The Basalam-WooCommerce sync plugin folder exists in the WordPress plugins directory
  2. Confirm the plugin is active
    In WordPress admin, check the Plugins list to see if Basalam-WooCommerce is activated
    Affected if The plugin shows as 'Active' in the WordPress plugin list
  3. Inspect plugin PHP files for nonce implementation
    Access the plugin files via FTP or file manager, then open main PHP files (usually basalam-woocommerce.php or similar) and search for 'wp_nonce_field', 'wp_create_nonce', 'check_admin_referer', or 'check_ajax_referer'
    Affected if No nonce functions (wp_nonce_field, check_admin_referer, check_ajax_referer) are found in the plugin PHP files
  4. Check AJAX handlers for nonce validation
    In plugin files, locate AJAX action handlers (add_action calls with 'wp_ajax_') and verify they call nonce validation functions before processing requests
    Affected if AJAX endpoints process requests without calling nonce validation functions such as check_ajax_referer or wp_verify_nonce
  5. Inspect HTML forms for nonce fields
    View page source of any Basalam plugin admin pages or frontend forms, or inspect form PHP code, looking for hidden input fields with names like '_wpnonce' or 'security'
    Affected if Forms generated by the plugin do not contain hidden nonce fields (_wpnonce)
  6. Test for CSRF vulnerability using a tool
    Use a browser extension or Burp Suite to capture a legitimate plugin action request, then replay it from an unauthenticated context without the nonce parameter to see if the action still executes
    Affected if The request executes successfully without the nonce token, indicating missing CSRF protection

A user is affected if the Basalam-WooCommerce sync plugin is installed and active, and its code lacks WordPress nonce validation in forms and AJAX endpoints.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement WordPress nonces (anti-CSRF tokens) in all forms and AJAX endpoints within the plugin, and validate these nonces server-side before processing any state-changing requests.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-61956 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-61956 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data