CVE-2026-6199
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Tenda F456 1.0.0.5. Impacted is the function fromqossetting of the file /goform/qossetting. The manipulation of the argument page results in stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in Tenda F456 router firmware 1.0.0.5 in the /goform/qossetting endpoint. The fromqossetting function fails to properly bounds-check the 'page' argument before copying it to a stack-allocated buffer, allowing remote attackers to overwrite return addresses and achieve arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the router admin interface or check the device label to confirm the model is Tenda F456Affected if Device is a Tenda F456 router
-
Check firmware versionNavigate to router admin panel (typically 192.168.0.1) and look in System Settings or Administration > Firmware Upgrade to find the installed version numberAffected if Firmware version is 1.0.0.5 or earlier on the Tenda F456
-
Verify qossetting endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access the URI /goform/qossetting via HTTP from an internal network host (e.g., curl http://192.168.0.1/goform/qossetting)Affected if The endpoint responds with any HTTP status (indicating it is exposed and reachable)
-
Check if QoS is enabledIn router admin panel, navigate to QoS or Bandwidth Control settings and determine if QoS functionality is turned onAffected if QoS feature is enabled on the device
A user is affected if they have a Tenda F456 router running firmware 1.0.0.5 (or earlier) with the QoS feature enabled and the /goform/qossetting endpoint accessible on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to patched firmware if available; otherwise, block external access to the /goform/qossetting endpoint at the network perimeter or disable qos functionality if the device supports it.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6199 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6199 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data