CVE-2026-6210
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA type confusion vulnerability in Qt SVG allows an attacker to cause an application crash via a crafted SVG image. When processing SVG marker references, the renderer retrieves a node by its id attribute and casts it to QSvgMarker* without verifying the node type. A non-marker element (such as a <line> element) that references itself as a marker triggers an out-of-bounds heap read due to the object size difference between QSvgLine and QSvgMarker, followed by an endless recursion that bypasses the marker recursion guard through incorrect virtual dispatch. The result is an application crash (denial of service). This issue affects Qt SVG: from 6.7.0 before 6.8.8, from 6.9.0 before 6.11.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA type confusion vulnerability in Qt SVG allows attackers to crash applications via crafted SVG images. The renderer casts nodes to QSvgMarker* without type verification, and when a non-marker element (e.g., <line>) references itself as a marker, it triggers an out-of-bounds heap read due to object size differences between QSvgLine and QSvgMarker, followed by recursion that bypasses the marker recursion guard through incorrect virtual dispatch.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Qt installation and versionRun 'qmake --version' or check Qt binaries/libraries in system paths (e.g., /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt6Svg.so on Linux, or inspect Qt6Core.dll properties on Windows). Also check your application's linked Qt libraries using 'ldd <application>' or dependency walker tools.Affected if Qt version is found and is below 6.8.8 or 6.11.1 (the fixed releases)
-
Confirm QtSvg module is loadedInspect your application's dependencies or runtime loaded modules to verify QtSvg (Qt6Svg or Qt5Svg) is present. On Linux: 'ldd <app> | grep -i svg'. On Windows: check for Qt6Svg.dll or Qt5Svg.dll in process modules.Affected if QtSvg module is linked or loaded into the application
-
Determine if SVG processing is activeReview application code or configuration for use of QSvgRenderer, QSvgWidget, or QImage loading SVG files. Check for file type handling that accepts .svg input, or network/data ingestion that processes SVG content.Affected if Application parses or renders SVG files from any source
-
Check for untrusted SVG input handlingAudit whether the application processes SVG files from external or untrusted sources (user uploads, network requests, file system locations controlled by other users, or data parsing routines that may contain SVG).Affected if Application handles SVG input from untrusted sources without sanitization
You are affected if your Qt installation uses the QtSvg module, processes SVG files (especially from untrusted sources), and the Qt version is below 6.8.8 or 6.11.1.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Qt SVG to version 6.8.8, 6.11.1, or later to patch the type confusion and recursion bypass issues. Until patched, avoid processing untrusted SVG files with vulnerable Qt applications.
Qt 6.8.8 or Qt 6.11.1 (depending on which release branch you are on)
- 1. Identify the current Qt SVG version in use by checking your project's Qt installation or dependencies.
- 2. If using Qt 6.7.x: upgrade to Qt 6.8.8 or later.
- 3. If using Qt 6.8.x (versions before 6.8.8): upgrade to Qt 6.8.8 or later.
- 4. If using Qt 6.9.x, 6.10.x, or 6.11.0: upgrade to Qt 6.11.1 or later.
- 5. Rebuild and redeploy the application with the updated Qt libraries.
- 6. Test the application with SVG rendering functionality to verify the fix works correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6210 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6210 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data