CWE-290Weakness · CWE-290

CVE-2026-6213

CRITICAL · 10.0 CVSS v4.0 Published 2026-05-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in Remote Spark SparkView before build 1122 allows an attacker to bypasses the local connection check and achieve arbitrary code execution as root on the server side. Depending on implementation the vulnerability can be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A vulnerability in Remote Spark SparkView before build 1122 allows attackers to bypass the local connection security check and execute arbitrary code as root on the server side. This authentication/authorization bypass enables unauthenticated remote code execution in certain implementations.

MitigationUpdate SparkView to build 1122 or later to remediate the vulnerability; if immediate patching is not feasible, implement network segmentation to restrict access to the SparkView service.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:A/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if SparkView is installed
    Look for SparkView process or service on the system. On Linux: 'ps aux | grep -i spark' or 'systemctl list-units | grep -i spark'. On Windows: check installed programs or running services named 'SparkView' or similar.
    Affected if SparkView process or service is found running on the system
  2. Determine installed SparkView build version
    Check the SparkView version or build number. Common methods: (1) Query the service directly if it exposes version info, (2) Check installation directory for version files, (3) Use 'sparkview --version' or similar CLI if available, (4) Check Windows Registry or Linux package manager for installed version.
    Affected if Installed build version is less than 1122 (e.g., build 1121, 1120, or earlier)
  3. Verify local connection security is configured
    Examine SparkView configuration files for security settings related to local connections. Look for settings controlling authentication requirements for localhost/127.0.0.1 connections. Check config files in installation directory or /etc/sparkview/.
    Affected if Local connection security check is disabled or allows unauthenticated access
  4. Check network exposure of SparkView service
    Determine if SparkView listens on network interfaces beyond localhost. Use 'netstat -tlnp | grep -i spark' or 'ss -tlnp | grep -i spark' to see listening ports and bound addresses. If bound to 0.0.0.0 or non-localhost IP, the service is network-accessible.
    Affected if SparkView is listening on a network interface accessible to untrusted users (not localhost-only)

You are affected if SparkView is installed with a build version before 1122 AND the service is network-accessible or has local connection security checks disabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update SparkView to build 1122 or later to remediate the vulnerability; if immediate patching is not feasible, implement network segmentation to restrict access to the SparkView service.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,080
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,728.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6213 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6213 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data