CVE-2026-6227
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe BackWPup plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Local File Inclusion via the `block_name` parameter of the `/wp-json/backwpup/v1/getblock` REST endpoint in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.6 due to a non-recursive `str_replace()` sanitization of path traversal sequences. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to include arbitrary PHP files on the server via crafted traversal sequences (e.g., `....//`), which can be leveraged to read sensitive files such as `wp-config.php` or achieve remote code execution in certain configurations. Administrators have the ability to grant individual users permission to handle backups, which may then allow lower-level users to exploit this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe BackWPup WordPress plugin has a Local File Inclusion vulnerability in its REST API endpoint `/wp-json/backwpup/v1/getblock`. The `block_name` parameter uses non-recursive `str_replace()` to sanitize path traversal sequences, allowing `....//` to bypass the filter and include arbitrary PHP files. Attackers with Administrator-level access (or users granted backup permissions by admins) can read sensitive files like wp-config.php or achieve RCE.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm BackWPup plugin is installedGo to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins, or check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for the backwpup folderAffected if The BackWPup plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed BackWPup versionCheck the plugin header in backwpup.php file or view the installed version in the WordPress Plugins admin pageAffected if The installed version is 5.6.6 or lower, or cannot be determined to be newer than 5.6.6
-
Verify the REST API endpoint is accessibleSend a GET request to /wp-json/backwpup/v1/getblock?block_name=test and check for a valid response (authentication may be required)Affected if The endpoint responds (with or without authentication), indicating the vulnerable API is exposed
-
Check for Administrator or backup-related user rolesReview WordPress user roles under Users section, or check BackWPup plugin settings for any custom permission grants to lower-privileged usersAffected if Any user has Administrator role, or any non-admin user has been granted backup task creation or management permissions
-
Test path traversal filter bypass (optional verification)If authenticated as Admin, send a request to /wp-json/backwpup/v1/getblock?block_name=....//wp-config.php and check if the file content is returnedAffected if The API returns content from wp-config.php or other arbitrary files, confirming the LFI vulnerability is exploitable
You are affected if BackWPup plugin is installed at version 5.6.6 or lower AND the REST API endpoint is accessible to your user account or any administrator on your site.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate BackWPup to the latest version beyond 5.6.6 and audit user permissions to ensure only trusted administrators have backup-related access.
Latest BackWPup version (higher than 5.6.6)
- Check the current BackWPup plugin version installed on your WordPress site
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in the WordPress admin dashboard
- Locate BackWPup and note the current version number
- Backup your WordPress site before performing any plugin updates
- Update BackWPup to the latest available version via Plugins > Installed Plugins > Update Now
- Verify the update was successful and the new version is installed
- Test that the REST endpoint /wp-json/backwpup/v1/getblock is no longer vulnerable by confirming path traversal sequences are properly blocked
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6227 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6227 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data