CVE-2026-62294
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFlameshot is powerful yet simple to use screenshot software. Prior to 14.0.0, the Open With feature wrote screenshots to a predictable temporary path and followed symlinks, creating a time-of-check to time-of-use race that allowed a local unprivileged attacker on the same machine to pre-plant a symlink and cause Flameshot to write PNG data through it, overwriting any file the victim user could write. This issue is fixed in version 14.0.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFlameshot before version 14.0.0 had a TOCTOU (time-of-check to time-of-use) vulnerability in its 'Open With' feature. The feature wrote screenshots to a predictable temporary path and followed symlinks, allowing a local unprivileged attacker to pre-plant a symlink that would cause Flameshot to overwrite any file the victim user could write with PNG data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Flameshot is installedRun 'flameshot --version' or check package manager (dpkg -l | grep flameshot, rpm -q flameshot)Affected if Flameshot is not found on the system - not affected
-
Check installed Flameshot versionExecute 'flameshot --version' and compare the version number to 14.0.0Affected if Version is lower than 14.0.0 (e.g., 13.x, 12.x, etc.)
-
Identify Open With feature configurationCheck for config file at ~/.config/flameshot/flameshot.ini or look for 'openWith' entries in the configurationAffected if Configuration file exists with Open With feature settings present
-
Check for historically predictable temp file behaviorReview any existing screenshots or temporary directories in /tmp for patterns matching 'flameshot' with predictable naming (note: this may not show current activity)Affected if Temp files show predictable naming patterns rather than random UUIDs
The environment is affected if Flameshot version is below 14.0.0 and the Open With feature is configured or used.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Flameshot to version 14.0.0 or later, which implements non-predictable temporary paths and stops following symlinks.
14.0.0
- Upgrade Flameshot to version 14.0.0 or later. For most Linux distributions, this can be done via the package manager (e.g., `sudo apt update && sudo apt install flameshot` on Debian/Ubuntu, or `sudo dnf update flameshot` on Fedora). Verify the installed version with `flameshot --version` after upgrading to confirm the fix is applied.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,952.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-62294 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-62294 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data