CVE-2026-62355
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTDengine is an open source, time-series database optimized for Internet of Things devices. Prior to 3.4.1.15, a Data Reader admin_user on a TDengine Cloud DB instance could run create udf even though standard users should have read-only permissions for non-database objects and show dnodes and create user were denied. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.1.15.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceTDengine Cloud DB versions before 3.4.1.15 contained an authorization bypass where a Data Reader admin_user could execute the `create udf` (user-defined function) command despite having read-only permissions for non-database objects. This privilege escalation occurred because the permission check for UDF creation was not properly enforced, allowing a restricted admin user to create database objects.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify TDengine Cloud DB versionQuery the TDengine instance for its version using the appropriate client tool or API (e.g., taos -v, or SELECT %%b FROM %%information_schema.insufficient_versions or similar system query depending on your client). Compare the returned version number to 3.4.1.15.Affected if The installed version is TDengine Cloud DB and the version number is less than 3.4.1.15 (e.g., 3.4.1.14, 3.4.0.x, etc.).
-
Verify user role assignmentCheck if the admin_user in question is assigned the Data Reader role, which should grant only read-only permissions to non-database objects. Query the user/role assignment tables in TDengine (such as SELECT * FROM %%information_schema.user_tasks or the appropriate system catalog depending on your TDengine deployment).Affected if The admin_user has the Data Reader role assigned, which should restrict them to read-only operations.
-
Test UDF creation permissionAttempt to execute the 'create udf' command using the restricted Data Reader admin_user account. This command should fail if permissions are properly enforced, but will succeed if the vulnerability exists.Affected if The Data Reader admin_user can successfully execute 'create udf' and create a user-defined function, indicating the authorization bypass is present.
You are affected if running TDengine Cloud DB version below 3.4.1.15 AND your environment has admin_user accounts with Data Reader role that can successfully execute 'create udf' commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade TDengine Cloud DB instances to version 3.4.1.15 or later to patch the authorization bypass in the UDF creation permission check.
TDengine 3.4.1.15
- 1. Backup your TDengine database, including all schemas, data, and user configurations
- 2. Stop the TDengine services on all nodes in your cluster
- 3. Update the TDengine package to version 3.4.1.15 using your package manager or download from the official repository (github.com/taosdata/TDengine/releases)
- 4. Verify the integrity of the downloaded package using checksums if available
- 5. Install the updated TDengine 3.4.1.15 packages on all cluster nodes
- 6. Review and update any configuration files that may have changed between your current version and 3.4.1.15
- 7. Start the TDengine services on all nodes
- 8. Verify the upgrade by logging in as the admin_user and confirming that create udf is properly restricted for Data Reader roles
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-62355 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-62355 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data