CVE-2026-62418
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLow-privileged authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Syncope via Connectors and Resources check. This issue affects Apache Syncope: from 3.0.0-M0 through 3.0.16, from 4.0.0-M0 Through 4.0.6, from 4.1.0-M0 through 4.1.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.7 / 4.1.2, which fix this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAuthenticated low-privileged SSRF in Apache Syncope's Connectors and Resources check allows attackers to induce the server to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external resources, potentially accessing internal services, bypassing firewalls, or performing network reconnaissance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0, <= 3.0.16>= 4.0.0, < 4.0.7>= 4.1.0, < 4.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Syncope versionCheck the deployed WAR file name (e.g., syncope.war or syncope-3.x.x.war), or look for a version.properties file in the deployment directory, or check the startup logs for the version stringAffected if Version is 3.0.0 through 3.0.16, 4.0.0 through 4.0.6, or 4.1.0 through 4.1.1
-
Verify Connector endpoint accessibilityReview the Apache Syncope administration console or API documentation to determine if low-privileged users (non-admin roles) have access to the /connector/{uid}/check endpoint or equivalent Connector management APIAffected if Low-privileged users can invoke or access the Connector check functionality via REST API or UI
-
Verify Resource endpoint accessibilityReview user role configurations to determine if non-administrative users can access the /resource/{key}/check endpoint or equivalent Resource check functionalityAffected if Low-privileged users can invoke or access the Resource check functionality via REST API or UI
-
Confirm check feature is enabledInspect the deployed web.xml or security configuration to verify that the Connector and Resource check endpoints are exposed and not explicitly disabled or restricted to admin-only rolesAffected if The check endpoints are active and accessible to users with standard/low-privileged roles
You are affected if your Apache Syncope version falls within 3.0.0-3.0.16, 4.0.0-4.0.6, or 4.1.0-4.1.1 AND low-privileged users can access the Connector or Resource check functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.0.74.1.2
Upgrade Apache Syncope to version 4.0.7 or 4.1.2 (or later) which contains the fix for this vulnerability.
4.0.7 or 4.1.2
- 1. Identify the current Apache Syncope version by checking the application or deployment configuration
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade target: upgrade to 4.0.7 if currently on 4.0.x series; upgrade to 4.1.2 if currently on 4.1.x series; if on 3.x, upgrade to either 4.0.7 or 4.1.2
- 3. Review the Apache Syncope upgrade documentation and release notes for migration considerations
- 4. Create a complete backup of the current installation including database, configuration files, and any custom deployments
- 5. Download Apache Syncope version 4.0.7 or 4.1.2 from the official Apache Syncope distribution repository (downloads.apache.org/syncope)
- 6. Stop the running Apache Syncope service
- 7. Install the new version following the standard deployment procedure
- 8. Verify the service starts successfully and all components initialize without errors
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-62418 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-62418 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data