CVE-2026-62496
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in the Oracle Yard Management product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.6-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Yard Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Yard Management. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection or command injection vulnerability in Oracle Yard Management's Internal Operations component allows authenticated low-privilege users to execute arbitrary commands via specially crafted HTTP requests, leading to complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.2.6, <= 12.2.15CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Oracle E-Business Suite versionQuery the Oracle database for the version using SQL: SELECT release_name FROM applsys.fnd_product_groups; or check the Oracle Applications Manager (OAM) interface for version information.Affected if The installed version falls within the range 12.2.6 to 12.2.15 inclusive.
-
Confirm the Yard Management module is enabledCheck if the Yard Management responsibility is assigned to any user by querying: SELECT * FROM fnd_responsibilities_vl WHERE responsibility_name LIKE '%Yard%'; Also verify via Oracle Applications Manager if the module is listed as installed.Affected if The Yard Management module is installed and active in the E-Business Suite environment.
-
Verify HTTP access to Oracle E-Business SuiteCheck the Oracle HTTP Server (OHS) configuration and determine if the /OA_HTML/ or /webservices/ endpoints are accessible externally. Review the httpd.conf or Oracle WebLogic configuration for exposed URLs.Affected if The E-Business Suite HTTP interface is accessible over the network, especially from untrusted networks.
-
Review low-privileged user accounts with access to Yard ManagementQuery for users assigned the Yard Management responsibility with low-privileged roles: SELECT fu.user_name, fr.responsibility_name FROM fnd_user fu JOIN fnd_user_resp_groups fur ON fu.user_id = fur.user_id JOIN fnd_responsibilities_vl fr ON fur.responsibility_id = fr.responsibility_id WHERE fr.responsibility_name LIKE '%Yard%';Affected if Any low-privileged user account exists that has access to the Yard Management module via HTTP.
-
Check for external network exposure of E-Business Suite portsReview firewall rules, load balancer configurations, and WebLogic/Oracle HTTP Server bindings to determine if port 8000, 8001, or standard HTTP/HTTPS ports are exposed to the internet or untrusted internal networks.Affected if The E-Business Suite HTTP ports are reachable from outside the trusted network perimeter.
If your Oracle E-Business Suite version is between 12.2.6 and 12.2.15, the Yard Management module is enabled, and the HTTP interface is network-accessible to attackers, your environment is likely affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant Oracle Critical Patch Update for Oracle E-Business Suite or implement web application firewall (WAF) rules to filter malicious HTTP parameters until the official patch can be applied.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-62496 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-62496 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data