CVE-2026-6250
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn authenticated format string vulnerability exists in the ONVIF service of Tapo C110 v2 due to improper handling of user-controlled input. Externally controlled data is interpreted as a format string, which can be used to manipulate stack memory, including control flow data such as return addresses. A remote authenticated attacker may redirect execution flow to existing internal functions, triggering an unauthorized factory reset, leading to loss of configuration, deletion of stored credentials and service disruption.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAuthenticated format string vulnerability in the ONVIF service of Tapo C110 v2 allows an authenticated attacker to manipulate stack memory through user-controlled input being interpreted as a format string. This enables control flow hijacking via return address manipulation to trigger unauthorized factory resets, resulting in credential deletion and service disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.5.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and firmware versionAccess the Tapo mobile app or web interface and navigate to the device settings or firmware information section to view the current firmware versionAffected if The firmware version displayed is less than 1.5.4 (for example, 1.5.3, 1.5.2, or earlier)
-
Confirm ONVIF service is enabledCheck the device settings in the Tapo app or web interface for ONVIF configuration options, or scan the device network ports (typically 2020 or 8080 for ONVIF) to confirm the service is listeningAffected if The ONVIF service is enabled and accessible on the device
-
Verify ONVIF service network exposureUse a network scanner or check router firewall settings to determine if ONVIF ports are exposed to untrusted networks or the internetAffected if The ONVIF service is reachable from untrusted networks or directly from the internet
-
Review ONVIF authentication credentialsCheck the ONVIF user credentials configured in the device settings or examine access logs for ONVIF authentication attemptsAffected if Simple, default, or easily guessable ONVIF credentials are in use, or credentials are shared across multiple devices
The device is affected if it is a Tapo C110 with firmware version below 1.5.4 and has the ONVIF service enabled and accessible, especially from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.5.4
Apply vendor firmware patches when available; until then, restrict ONVIF service access to trusted networks or disable if unused, and rotate credentials to limit authenticated attack surface.
Tapo C110 Firmware 1.5.4
- Locate the Tapo C110 device in your network or access it via the Tapo app
- Navigate to the device settings and check the current firmware version
- Download firmware version 1.5.4 or later from the official TP-Link support page (www.tp-link.com)
- Follow TP-Link's official firmware update instructions to apply the update to the Tapo C110 device
- After updating, verify the firmware version shows 1.5.4 or higher
- Confirm the ONVIF service is functioning normally post-update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6250 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6250 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data