CVE-2026-6349
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe iSherlock developed by HGiga has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated local attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceiSherlock by HGiga contains an OS Command Injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary OS commands on the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm iSherlock installationLocate iSherlock installation directories or check for iSherlock services/processes on the system (e.g., review installed applications, running services, or startup configurations)Affected if iSherlock by HGiga is installed on the system
-
Identify iSherlock versionCheck the installed version of iSherlock using vendor-provided methods (e.g., about dialog, version file, or system inventory tools) and compare against any officially documented version rangesAffected if The installed version falls within an affected version range (if such ranges become known)
-
Verify web interface exposureDetermine if the iSherlock web interface is accessible from the network (check firewall rules, listening ports, and exposed URLs)Affected if The iSherlock web interface is network-accessible to untrusted users
-
Check for unauthenticated access pointsReview the iSherlock web application for parameters or endpoints that process user input without requiring authenticationAffected if There are unauthenticated endpoints or parameters that accept user input
-
Inspect for command execution logsReview iSherlock and system logs for signs of suspicious command execution, unusual processes, or evidence of injection attemptsAffected if Logs show unexpected command executions or injection patterns originating from iSherlock input fields
Your environment is affected if iSherlock by HGiga is installed and its web interface is accessible to unauthenticated users without additional access controls preventing command injection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and sanitization on all user-controlled parameters used in system calls, and replace dynamic command construction with parameterized APIs or whitelisted execution methods.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6349 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6349 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data