CVE-2026-6606
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in modelscope agentscope up to 1.0.18. This vulnerability affects the function _process_audio_block of the file src/agentscope/agent/_agent_base.py. Executing a manipulation of the argument url can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the _process_audio_block function within src/agentscope/agent/_agent_base.py of modelscope agentscope up to version 1.0.18. The function accepts a URL parameter without proper validation, allowing remote attackers to manipulate the server into making arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify agentscope installation and versionRun `pip show agentscope` or check your package manager to determine if agentscope is installed and what version number is present. Compare this version against the affected range (up to and including 1.0.18).Affected if The installed version is 1.0.18 or lower.
-
Locate the vulnerable source fileSearch for the file `src/agentscope/agent/_agent_base.py` within the agentscope installation directory or source code repository.Affected if This file exists in the installed version.
-
Verify the vulnerable function existsInspect the file and search for the function named `_process_audio_block`. Confirm its presence.Affected if The `_process_audio_block` function is defined in the codebase.
-
Check for URL handling in the vulnerable functionExamine the `_process_audio_block` function code to see if it accepts a URL parameter and performs HTTP requests (using libraries like requests, urllib, or similar).Affected if The function accepts and processes URL input without visible validation logic.
-
Determine if audio block processing is usedSearch project logs, configuration files, or code that calls `_process_audio_block`. Also check if there are any API endpoints or input paths that feed data into this function.Affected if The function is actively called with user-controlled URL input in your deployment.
You are affected if agentscope version 1.0.18 or lower is installed AND the _process_audio_block function is present AND your environment processes audio block URLs through it.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation for the URL parameter, including allowlist validation of permitted domains/IPs and blocking of internal network addresses (localhost, private ranges). Apply the principle of least privilege to network access and consider disabling the audio block processing feature until a proper fix is available.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6606 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6606 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data