CVE-2026-6711
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Website LLMs.txt plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the 'tab' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 8.2.6. This is due to the use of filter_input() without a sanitization filter and insufficient output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Website LLMs.txt WordPress plugin uses filter_input() to retrieve the 'tab' parameter without applying a sanitization filter, and the output is not properly escaped when rendered. This allows unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript via a malicious URL that executes in an administrator's browser when they click the link (reflected XSS).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Website LLMs.txt plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Website LLMs.txt' or check the plugin files in wp-content/plugins/llms-txt/ directoryAffected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Determine installed plugin versionCheck the plugin main file (e.g., llms-txt.php) for the version header comment, or view the plugin details in the WordPress plugins admin pageAffected if The version is unknown or within a range that lacks the fix for CVE-2026-6711 (the plugin processes the 'tab' parameter without sanitization)
-
Inspect the tab parameter handling codeLocate the plugin PHP file that processes the 'tab' query parameter (search for filter_input(INPUT_GET, 'tab') or $_GET['tab']) and verify whether the value is sanitized (e.g., via sanitize_text_field, esc_html) before outputAffected if The code uses filter_input() or $_GET['tab'] without applying a sanitization function before echoing the value
-
Check if output escaping is applied when rendering the tab valueSearch the plugin code for where the tab parameter value is output (echo or print statements involving the tab variable) and verify that proper escaping functions (esc_html, esc_attr) are usedAffected if The tab value is echoed directly or without escaping functions, allowing injected JavaScript to execute
-
Test the reflected XSS via a crafted URLWith administrator privileges, attempt to access a URL like yoursite.com/wp-admin/admin.php?page=llms-txt&tab=<img+src=x+onerror=alert(1)> and observe if the alert executes or inspect the page source for the unescaped payloadAffected if The injected script tag appears unescaped in the HTML output and executes in the browser
A user is affected if the Website LLMs.txt plugin is installed and processes the 'tab' parameter without sanitizing or escaping the output, allowing reflected XSS to trigger when an administrator clicks a malicious link.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the plugin to a patched version once available. In the meantime, warn administrators to avoid clicking untrusted links to mitigate the social engineering vector.
Latest version higher than 8.2.6 (check WordPress plugin repository for current stable release)
- 1. Check the WordPress plugin repository for the Website LLMs.txt plugin to identify the latest available version
- 2. Verify that the latest version is higher than 8.2.6
- 3. Update the plugin to the latest version via WordPress admin dashboard or via wp-cli: wp plugin update llms-txt
- 4. Confirm the update completed successfully
- 5. Test the 'tab' parameter functionality to ensure the fix does not break legitimate functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6711 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6711 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data