InstructlabApplication · Redhat

CVE-2026-6855

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found in InstructLab. A local attacker could exploit a path traversal vulnerability in the chat session handler by manipulating the `logs_dir` parameter. This allows the attacker to create new directories and write files to arbitrary locations on the system, potentially leading to unauthorized data modification or disclosure.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A path traversal vulnerability exists in InstructLab's chat session handler where the `logs_dir` parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing a local attacker to manipulate it with traversal sequences (e.g., '../') to create directories and write files to arbitrary locations on the system, leading to potential unauthorized data modification or disclosure.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and sanitization on the `logs_dir` parameter to reject path traversal sequences and restrict file/directory creation to intended safe paths.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
InstructlabApplication
Affected:all versions
Enterprise Linux AiOperating system
Affected:= 3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if InstructLab is installed
    Run 'pip show instructlab' or check for the package in your Python environment using 'pip list | grep -i instructlab'
    Affected if The package is present on the system
  2. Determine the installed InstructLab version
    Run 'pip show instructlab' and look at the Version field, or use 'instructlab --version' if the CLI is available
    Affected if Any version of Redhat Instructlab is installed (all versions are affected)
  3. Check for RHEL AI installation
    Run 'rpm -qa | grep -i instructlab' or check for the rhel-ai package with 'rpm -qa | grep -i rhel.*ai'
    Affected if Redhat Enterprise Linux Ai version 3.0 is installed
  4. Verify if chat session logging is configured
    Look for configuration files or environment variables that set 'logs_dir' parameter. Check ~/.config/instructlab/config.yml or /etc/instructlab/ for logging-related settings containing 'logs_dir'
    Affected if A logs_dir parameter is configured for chat session handling, as the vulnerability requires this parameter to be present and user-controllable
  5. Check chat session logs directory permissions
    Inspect the configured logs directory path. If logs_dir allows relative paths or traverses outside intended directories, the vulnerability is exploitable. Search for recent directory creation events in unexpected paths using 'find / -newermm [timestamp] -type d 2>/dev/null' if root access is available
    Affected if The logs_dir can be set to a path containing '../' sequences or points outside the intended logs directory

If InstructLab or RHEL AI version 3.0 is installed and the chat session handler's logs_dir parameter is configurable, the environment is affected by this path traversal vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the `logs_dir` parameter to reject path traversal sequences and restrict file/directory creation to intended safe paths.

Fix this in Instructlab Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,330
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6855 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6855 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data