CVE-2026-6875
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServiceNow has addressed a remote code execution vulnerability that was identified in the ServiceNow AI platform. This vulnerability could enable an unauthenticated user, in certain circumstances, to execute code within the ServiceNow platform. ServiceNow addressed this vulnerability by deploying a security update to hosted instances. Relevant security updates have also been provided to ServiceNow self-hosted customers and partners. Further, the vulnerability is addressed in the listed patches and family releases, which have been made available to hosted and self-hosted customers, as well as partners. We are not currently aware of exploitation against ServiceNow instances. We recommend customers promptly apply appropriate updates or upgrade to a patched release if they have not already done so.
In the news
Third-party coverage- ServiceNow pre-auth RCE exploited in the wild (CVE-2026-6875)
- Exploitation of ServiceNow Vulnerability Seen Days After ...
- Critical ServiceNow AI Platform Flaw Exploited for Unauthenticated Code ...
- Critical ServiceNow code execution flaw now exploited in attacks
- Attackers Exploit Critical ServiceNow RCE Flaw CVE-2026-6875
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceServiceNow AI platform contains a critical remote code execution vulnerability (CVSS 9.5) enabling unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code within the platform under certain conditions. The vulnerability was addressed via security updates deployed to hosted instances and patches provided to self-hosted customers and partners.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ServiceNow instance versionNavigate to System Diagnostics > System Version or check the login page footer for the build version. Alternatively, query the 'sys_properties' table for 'glide.version' or use the 'info.do' endpoint.Affected if The installed version matches or predates the patched releases mentioned in ServiceNow's security advisory for this CVE
-
Verify AI platform module statusCheck if AI Search, AI Risk, or other AI-related plugins are activated. Go to System Definition > Plugins and search for 'AI' related plugins. Look for 'AI Search', 'AI Risk', 'Predictive Intelligence', or similar AI modules.Affected if AI platform plugins/modules are installed and active, as the vulnerability affects the ServiceNow AI platform component
-
Check for unauthorized script executionReview system logs in 'System Logs > All' or query the 'sys_script' table for recently created or modified script includes, business rules, or scheduled jobs that appear unfamiliar. Check 'sys_audit' table for unusual create/modify events on executable objects.Affected if Unfamiliar scripts, business rules, or scheduled jobs exist that were not created by authorized administrators, indicating potential exploitation
-
Inspect outbound network connectionsReview 'System Diagnostics > Connection Logs' or check firewall/proxy logs for unexpected outbound connections from the ServiceNow server to unknown external addresses, particularly those associated with command-and-control behavior.Affected if Unexpected outbound network connections are observed originating from the ServiceNow instance
An unpatched ServiceNow instance with AI platform features enabled is likely affected; verify version against ServiceNow's advisory and confirm no unauthorized script modifications or unusual network activity has occurred.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the provided security patches or upgrade to the patched family releases as specified in ServiceNow's security advisory; prioritize immediate deployment given the critical severity and unauthenticated attack vector.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6875 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6875 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data