CVE-2026-6898
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Wishlist Member plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'WishListMember3_Hooks::generate_api_key' function in all versions up to, and including, 3.30.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to update the REST API Secret Key, which can be used to create a new membership level assigned the administrator WordPress role, and register an arbitrary administrator-level user account, resulting in complete site takeover.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Wishlist Member plugin for WordPress has a broken access control vulnerability in the generate_api_key function. The function lacks a capability check, allowing any authenticated user with Subscriber-level access or higher to call it. Attackers can update the REST API Secret Key, create membership levels with Administrator role, and register new admin accounts, achieving full site compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Wishlist Member plugin is installedGo to WordPress admin > Plugins and look for 'Wishlist Member' in the installed plugins list, or check the plugins directory for /wp-content/plugins/wishlist-member/Affected if The plugin is installed and active
-
Determine installed Wishlist Member versionIn WordPress admin > Plugins, find Wishlist Member and note the version number displayed under the plugin name, or inspect the main plugin file header for the Version fieldAffected if Version is below 3.30.2 (the vulnerability is present in versions prior to 3.30.2)
-
Confirm REST API functionality is enabledCheck if WordPress REST API is accessible by visiting /wp-json/ in a browser, or verify the Wishlist Member API settings are accessible in the plugin admin panel under WishList Member > Settings > APIAffected if REST API endpoints are accessible and the Wishlist Member API module is enabled
-
Review user accounts with Subscriber roleIn WordPress admin > Users, examine all users with the Subscriber role. Any subscriber-level account could have exploited this vulnerability to escalate privilegesAffected if There are Subscriber-level users present in the system who should not have been granted API access
-
Audit for unauthorized Administrator accountsIn WordPress admin > Users, check for Administrator accounts that you did not create. Also check Wishlist Member > Membership Levels to see if any levels grant administrator-level capabilitiesAffected if There are Administrator accounts or membership levels with admin privileges that you did not explicitly create
If Wishlist Member is installed with a version below 3.30.2 and any authenticated users with Subscriber-level access exist in the system, the environment may be affected by this privilege escalation vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to Wishlist Member version 3.30.2 or later which includes the missing capability check. Until patched, consider restricting REST API access or temporarily disabling the plugin if running a version before 3.30.2.
Latest version of Wishlist Member plugin (after 3.30.1)
- Update the Wishlist Member plugin to the latest available version from the WordPress plugin repository or wishlistmember.com
- Verify that the updated version is higher than 3.30.1
- After updating, confirm that the generate_api_key function now includes proper capability checks
- Review user accounts with administrator roles created since the vulnerability was discovered
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6898 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6898 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data