CVE-2026-6907
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.5 and 5.2 before 5.2.14. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` erroneously caches requests where the `Vary` header contained an asterisk (`'*'`). This can lead to private data being stored and served. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ahmad Sadeddin for reporting this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDjango's UpdateCacheMiddleware incorrectly caches HTTP responses when the Vary header contains an asterisk ('*'). The Vary: * header signals that a response should not be cached because it varies based on multiple request characteristics, but Django was storing these responses anyway, leading to private or user-specific data being cached and potentially served to other users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.2, < 5.2.14>= 6.0, < 6.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Django versionRun `python -c 'import django; print(django.get_version())'` or check your requirements.txt/poetry.lock fileAffected if The version is >= 5.2 but < 5.2.14, or >= 6.0 but < 6.0.5
-
Verify UpdateCacheMiddleware is enabledCheck your Django settings file for MIDDLEWARE or MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES and confirm 'django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware' is listedAffected if UpdateCacheMiddleware is present in the middleware stack
-
Confirm caching is configuredCheck for a non-empty CACHES setting in your Django settings (e.g., CACHES = {'default': {'BACKEND': '...'}})Affected if Caching is enabled with any backend (locmem, redis, database, etc.)
-
Identify endpoints using Vary headerSearch your codebase for responses setting Vary header with '*' (e.g., response['Vary'] = '*' or @vary_on_headers('*'))Affected if Any view or code explicitly sets Vary: * on cached responses
You are affected if your Django version falls within the vulnerable range AND UpdateCacheMiddleware is active AND caching is enabled, because responses intended to remain private (Vary: *) would be incorrectly stored in cache and potentially served to other users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.2.146.0.5
Upgrade Django to version 6.0.5, 5.2.14, or later to patch the middleware logic. Alternatively, audit and temporarily disable UpdateCacheMiddleware on sensitive endpoints until the upgrade can be performed.
Django 5.2.14 or Django 6.0.5 (depending on your major version)
- 1. Identify your current Django version by running `django --version` or checking your requirements file
- 2. For Django 5.2.x: Upgrade to version 5.2.14 or later using pip: `pip install 'Django>=5.2.14'`
- 3. For Django 6.0.x: Upgrade to version 6.0.5 or later using pip: `pip install 'Django>=6.0.5'`
- 4. After upgrading, verify the installation: `django --version`
- 5. Run your test suite to ensure the application functions correctly after the upgrade
- 6. If you encounter issues, review the Django release notes for any breaking changes between your version and the target version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,360.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6907 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6907 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data