InjectionWeakness · CWE-74

CVE-2026-6980

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been found in Divyanshu-hash GitPilot-MCP up to 9ed9f153ba4158a2ad230ee4871b25130da29ffd. This impacts the function repo_path of the file main.py. Such manipulation of the argument command leads to command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Command injection vulnerability in GitPilot-MCP's main.py where the repo_path function accepts unsanitized user input through the command argument, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and sanitization on all command arguments, preferably using allowlists or parameterized command execution instead of shell command construction to prevent injection attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if GitPilot-MCP is installed
    Search for GitPilot-MCP in your environment: check for the package via pip list, look for the main.py file in your codebase, or identify any running processes or services that use GitPilot-MCP.
    Affected if GitPilot-MCP is present in your environment
  2. Locate the main.py file from GitPilot-MCP
    Find the main.py file within the GitPilot-MCP installation directory or repository. This is where the vulnerable repo_path function resides.
    Affected if main.py exists in your GitPilot-MCP installation
  3. Examine the repo_path function for command execution
    Open main.py and locate the repo_path function. Inspect how it handles the command argument and whether it passes user input to os.system, subprocess, or similar command execution APIs without sanitization.
    Affected if The repo_path function accepts user-controlled input and passes it directly to shell command execution without validation or sanitization
  4. Verify user input reaches the vulnerable function
    Trace how the command argument flows into the repo_path function. Determine if this input originates from external sources such as API requests, user-provided parameters, or network-based calls.
    Affected if External or user-controlled input can reach the repo_path function's command parameter unsanitized
  5. Check if command execution features are enabled
    Determine whether the GitPilot-MCP service is actively running and whether the repo_path function is exposed or callable through any API endpoint, CLI interface, or other invocation mechanism.
    Affected if The vulnerable function is accessible and can be triggered with user-supplied input

You are affected if GitPilot-MCP is installed and the repo_path function in its main.py accepts external input that flows to shell command execution without sanitization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation and sanitization on all command arguments, preferably using allowlists or parameterized command execution instead of shell command construction to prevent injection attacks.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,690
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6980 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6980 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data