CVE-2026-7063
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in code-projects Employee Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /370project/process/eprocess.php of the component Endpoint. Performing a manipulation of the argument pwd results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in code-projects Employee Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the 'pwd' parameter in the /370project/process/eprocess.php file. The lack of proper input sanitization or parameterized queries in the endpoint handling enables attackers to manipulate database queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Employee Management System installationLocate and identify the code-projects Employee Management System version 1.0 in your environment. Check for the presence of the /370project directory structure commonly deployed in web application servers.Affected if The system is running code-projects Employee Management System version 1.0
-
Verify vulnerable endpoint existsInspect your web server directories for the file /370project/process/eprocess.php. This file handles authentication POST requests containing the 'pwd' parameter.Affected if The file /370project/process/eprocess.php exists and is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS
-
Check for SQL injection vulnerability in pwd handlingReview the source code of eprocess.php and locate the code block handling the 'pwd' parameter. Search for database query execution involving this parameter without prepared statements or parameterized queries.Affected if The 'pwd' parameter is used directly in SQL queries without parameterized queries, input sanitization, or prepared statements
-
Verify authentication endpoint is exposedConfirm that the /370project/process/eprocess.php endpoint is reachable from the network (external or internal) and accepts POST requests containing the password field.Affected if The endpoint is publicly or internally accessible and accepts unauthenticated POST requests with the pwd parameter
You are affected if you run Employee Management System 1.0 with the /370project/process/eprocess.php file accessible and the password parameter handled without prepared statements or input sanitization in SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in eprocess.php, validate and sanitize all user inputs, and implement least-privilege database accounts. Apply the fix immediately given the public exploit and high CVSS score.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7063 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7063 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data