CVE-2026-7065
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in BidingCC BuildingAI up to 26.0.1. Impacted is the function uploadRemoteFile of the file packages/core/src/modules/upload/services/file-storage.service.ts of the component Remote Upload API. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in BidingCC BuildingAI's Remote Upload API. The uploadRemoteFile function in file-storage.service.ts accepts user-controlled URL input without proper validation, allowing attackers to make the server request arbitrary URLs. This could enable access to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or port scanning of internal infrastructure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm BidingCC BuildingAI installationIdentify the application name and verify it is BidingCC BuildingAI by checking the product documentation, installed software list, or application bannerAffected if The installed product is not BidingCC BuildingAI (not affected)
-
Check Remote Upload API availabilityDetermine if the Remote Upload API endpoint is accessible or enabled in the application configuration. Look for API routes such as /api/upload/remote or similar endpoints in the codebaseAffected if The Remote Upload API is exposed and accessible to users
-
Identify installed versionLocate the version information for BuildingAI installation - check package.json, configuration files, or the application's 'about' or version endpoint if available. Compare the installed version against any vendor release notesAffected if The installed version is unpatched and the vendor has released a fix for CVE-2026-7065
-
Inspect file-storage.service.ts configurationLocate the file-storage.service.ts file in the application source or deployed code. Examine the uploadRemoteFile function for URL validation logic. Check if user-controlled URL parameters are validated before being used in server requestsAffected if The uploadRemoteFile function lacks proper URL validation and accepts arbitrary user-provided URLs
-
Verify URL allowlist implementationReview the application's URL validation logic to determine if an allowlist filter is implemented for remote upload URLs. Check if internal/private IP ranges (127.0.0.1, 10.x, 192.168.x, etc.) and cloud metadata endpoints are explicitly blockedAffected if No URL allowlist exists or internal IP ranges are not blocked
The environment is affected if BidingCC BuildingAI is installed with the Remote Upload API enabled, the version is unpatched, and the uploadRemoteFile function lacks proper URL validation to prevent requests to internal/private addresses.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict URL validation with allowlist filtering, block requests to internal/private IP ranges (127.0.0.1, 10.x, 192.168.x, etc.), and disable the remote upload feature until a vendor patch is released.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7065 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7065 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data