Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2026-7071

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A security vulnerability has been detected in CodeAstro Online Job Portal 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /users/user-cvs/. The manipulation leads to file and directory information exposure. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

CodeAstro Online Job Portal 1.0 contains a directory listing or path traversal vulnerability in the /users/user-cvs/ endpoint that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to enumerate and access sensitive files and directory structures, potentially exposing user CVs, personal information, or application configuration files.

MitigationDisable directory listing on the web server for the /users/ path, implement proper access control and authentication on the user-cvs functionality, and validate/sanitize all path inputs to prevent traversal attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm CodeAstro Online Job Portal 1.0 installation
    Inspect the web application banner, footer, or source code for the application name and version 1.0. Check the main page and about section for 'CodeAstro Online Job Portal' branding.
    Affected if The application is CodeAstro Online Job Portal version 1.0
  2. Check if /users/user-cvs/ endpoint is accessible
    Send an HTTP GET request to http://[target]/users/user-cvs/ and examine the response for directory listing or file contents.
    Affected if The endpoint returns a 200 OK with a directory listing or file contents without authentication
  3. Verify directory listing is enabled
    Look for directory index listings in the /users/ or /users/user-cvs/ response showing file names, sizes, and timestamps.
    Affected if The response displays a directory index with clickable file links or file metadata
  4. Test for path traversal vulnerability
    Send requests to /users/user-cvs/../../../etc/passwd or similar traversal sequences and check if the server returns files outside the intended directory.
    Affected if Path traversal sequences return files from outside the /users/user-cvs/ directory
  5. Identify exposed sensitive files
    Review the directory listing or traversal results for CV files (pdf, doc, docx), personal information, or configuration files (config.php, .env, database credentials).
    Affected if User CVs, personal data, or application configuration files are accessible without authentication

A user is affected if the CodeAstro Online Job Portal 1.0 is running with the /users/user-cvs/ endpoint accessible without authentication and directory listing or path traversal is enabled, exposing sensitive files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Disable directory listing on the web server for the /users/ path, implement proper access control and authentication on the user-cvs functionality, and validate/sanitize all path inputs to prevent traversal attacks.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,290
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7071 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7071 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data