CVE-2026-7073
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in itsourcecode Construction Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /execute.php. This manipulation of the argument code causes sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Construction Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL code via the 'code' parameter in /execute.php. The lack of input sanitization or parameterized queries enables attackers to manipulate database queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm itsourcecode Construction Management System is installedLocate the application by searching for files or directories related to 'itsourcecode' or 'Construction Management System' on the web server. Check web server logs or directory listings for this application.Affected if The application is present on the system
-
Identify the installed versionCheck the application's source files, README, or configuration for a version number. Look for version.txt, version.php, or version info in the main index file or footer.Affected if The installed version is 1.0
-
Verify execute.php exists and is accessibleLocate the execute.php file in the web application's directory structure. Confirm the file exists and is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS request to the endpoint.Affected if execute.php file exists and is web-accessible
-
Check if the code parameter is processed without sanitizationReview the execute.php source code to see if the 'code' parameter is used in database queries without prepared statements, parameterized queries, or input sanitization.Affected if The 'code' parameter is directly used in SQL queries without sanitization or parameterization
A user is affected if the itsourcecode Construction Management System version 1.0 is installed with the execute.php file accessible and the 'code' parameter handled without SQL injection protections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all database operations, particularly in execute.php. Alternatively, use stored procedures with strict input validation and least-privilege database accounts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7073 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7073 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data