CVE-2026-7076
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Courier Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /edit_branch.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument ID can lead to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Courier Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to manipulate the ID parameter in /edit_branch.php to inject arbitrary SQL queries, potentially leading to unauthorized database access or data exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Courier Management System installationLocate the web application directory and identify if itsourcecode Courier Management System is deployed. Check for typical installation paths such as /var/www/html/, /www/, or C:\inetpub\wwwroot\ depending on your server OS.Affected if The application is present on the server
-
Verify the installed versionCheck version.php, README.txt, or any version metadata file within the Courier Management System installation directory for version 1.0.Affected if The installed version is 1.0 or falls within the affected version range
-
Locate the vulnerable scriptSearch for the file edit_branch.php within the web application directory structure.Affected if The file edit_branch.php exists in the application
-
Inspect the ID parameter handlingOpen edit_branch.php and locate the code that processes the ID parameter from the request (typically via $_GET or $_POST). Examine how this ID value is incorporated into SQL queries.Affected if The ID parameter is directly concatenated into SQL queries without using prepared statements or parameter binding
-
Check for SQL injection protectionReview the SQL query execution code in edit_branch.php. Verify whether database queries use parameterized queries (prepared statements with placeholders) or if raw user input is embedded into SQL strings.Affected if Queries are constructed using string concatenation with the ID parameter rather than parameterized queries
You are affected if you have itsourcecode Courier Management System version 1.0 with edit_branch.php present and the ID parameter is used in SQL queries without parameterized prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for the ID parameter in edit_branch.php, or add robust input validation/sanitization before using the ID value in SQL queries.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7076 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7076 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data