dbcve.org
Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2026-7085

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
56/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was determined in HBAI-Ltd Toonflow-app up to 1.1.1. This vulnerability affects the function z.url of the file src/routes/setting/about/downloadApp.ts of the component downloadApp Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument url causes path traversal. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. It is stated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The vendor explains in a reply to the issue report, that "[t]his interface is used for online updates, and the update URL has been statically compiled in the official code repository. Unless users modify the code, the requested address will be the official source address."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Path traversal vulnerability in Toonflow-app's downloadApp endpoint. The z.url function in src/routes/setting/about/downloadApp.ts fails to properly sanitize the url parameter, allowing attackers to manipulate file paths and potentially access sensitive files outside the intended directory.

MitigationImplement strict path validation and sanitization in the z.url function to prevent path traversal sequences (../). Since the vendor claims the URL is statically compiled, verify the actual code implementation and ensure all user-supplied URL inputs are properly validated before use.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Toonflow-app is present
    Search for Toonflow-app installation directories, processes, or packages on the system. Look for directories containing 'toonflow' or the application binary/package.
    Affected if Toonflow-app is found running or installed on the system
  2. Determine Toonflow-app version
    Check the installed version of Toonflow-app using package manager, application metadata, or version file. Compare the installed version against any available version information.
    Affected if A version of Toonflow-app is installed and the version is unpatched for the path traversal vulnerability
  3. Inspect the vulnerable source file
    Locate and examine the file src/routes/setting/about/downloadApp.ts in the application source. Look for the z.url function implementation and check if it performs path validation on the url parameter.
    Affected if The file exists and the z.url function lacks proper path traversal sanitization (no validation of ../ sequences)
  4. Verify endpoint accessibility
    Check if the /downloadApp endpoint (or corresponding route) is exposed and accessible in the running application. Test if the endpoint accepts a url parameter.
    Affected if The downloadApp endpoint is accessible and accepts url parameters without validation

A user is affected if Toonflow-app is installed with an unpatched version where the downloadApp endpoint accepts unsanitized url parameters allowing path traversal sequences.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict path validation and sanitization in the z.url function to prevent path traversal sequences (../). Since the vendor claims the URL is statically compiled, verify the actual code implementation and ensure all user-supplied URL inputs are properly validated before use.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7085 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7085 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data