CVE-2026-7107
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in code-projects Invoice System in Laravel 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /company. This manipulation of the argument logo causes unrestricted upload. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe code-projects Invoice System in Laravel 1.0 contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability in the /company endpoint's logo upload function. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file types, allowing attackers to upload arbitrary files (including executable scripts) to the server. This remote vulnerability has a public exploit.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Invoice System versionLocate the application directory and check for version files, composer.json, or any version.txt/readme that mentions '1.0' or the code-projects Invoice SystemAffected if The installed version is code-projects Invoice System Laravel 1.0
-
Check if the /company endpoint existsLook for routes or controllers related to 'company' in the application's route files (typically routes/web.php) and check if a /company route is definedAffected if The /company route exists and is accessible in the application
-
Verify logo upload functionality is configuredSearch for logo upload-related code in controllers, specifically looking for 'logo', 'upload', or 'file' functions within company-related controllersAffected if Logo upload functionality is implemented and enabled for the company endpoint
-
Inspect the file upload validation logicExamine the upload handler code for the logo feature and check if there is strict validation of file extensions, MIME types, or file content (magic bytes) before savingAffected if The code lacks proper file type validation (no whitelist of allowed extensions/MIME types, no content validation)
You are affected if you are running code-projects Invoice System Laravel 1.0 and the /company endpoint's logo upload function is enabled without proper file type validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict file type validation using a whitelist of allowed extensions and MIME types, validate the actual file content (magic bytes), and store uploaded files outside the web root or in a non-executable directory.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7107 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7107 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data