Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-77

CVE-2026-7121

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw has been found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This affects the function setWizardCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. This manipulation of the argument wizard causes os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

OS command injection vulnerability in Totolink A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521. The setWizardCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi does not properly sanitize the wizard parameter before passing it to system calls, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands.

MitigationApply vendor firmware patch if available; otherwise, restrict network access to the CGI interface via firewall rules or disable remote administration to block exploitation of this command injection vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model
    Access router web interface or check device label/metadata to confirm the model is Totolink A8000RU
    Affected if Device is not a Totolink A8000RU router - this CVE does not apply
  2. Check firmware version
    Login to router admin panel, navigate to System Status or Firmware Upgrade page to view the installed firmware version. Alternatively, check via command line if you have telnet/ssh access.
    Affected if Firmware version is 7.1cu.643_b20200521 exactly, or falls within the 7.1cu family without the vendor patch applied
  3. Verify CGI interface is accessible
    Attempt to access http://<router-ip>/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi from a browser or curl request to confirm the endpoint responds
    Affected if The CGI interface is reachable from an attacker's network location - this is required for remote exploitation
  4. Check if remote administration is enabled
    In router web interface, navigate to Advanced Settings or Administration to see if Remote Management/Remote Administration is enabled and which IP addresses can access it
    Affected if Remote administration is enabled and allows access from outside the local network, increasing exposure to remote attackers
  5. Look for signs of compromise
    If you have shell access, run 'ps' to check for unexpected processes, check /tmp and /var directories for suspicious files, review router logs for unusual commands in the cstecgi.cgi logs
    Affected if Unexpected processes, suspicious files in /tmp, or unauthorized commands in logs indicate possible exploitation

You are affected if you own a Totolink A8000RU router running firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 and the CGI interface is network-accessible (especially with remote administration enabled), as the unauthenticated wizard parameter in cstecgi.cgi can be injected with OS commands.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor firmware patch if available; otherwise, restrict network access to the CGI interface via firewall rules or disable remote administration to block exploitation of this command injection vulnerability.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7121 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7121 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data