CVE-2026-7127
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in SourceCodester Pharmacy Sales and Inventory System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /ajax.php?action=delete_receiving. This manipulation of the argument ID causes sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in SourceCodester Pharmacy Sales and Inventory System 1.0 where the ID parameter in /ajax.php?action=delete_receiving is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm application identityIdentify the installed web application by examining the application structure, login pages, or source code headers. Look for pharmacy sales and inventory related functionality and branding indicating SourceCodester Pharmacy Sales and Inventory System.Affected if The system is running SourceCodester Pharmacy Sales and Inventory System
-
Verify the application versionLocate version information in the application. Check for version.php, readme files, or embedded version strings in the source code. The affected version is specifically 1.0.Affected if The installed version is 1.0
-
Locate ajax.php fileFind ajax.php in the web application root directory or within the main application folder structure.Affected if ajax.php file exists in the application
-
Examine delete_receiving action handlingOpen ajax.php and locate the code handling the delete_receiving action. Inspect how the ID parameter is processed when this action is called. Look for direct use of the ID parameter in SQL queries without prepared statements, parameter binding, or input sanitization.Affected if The ID parameter is used directly in SQL queries without prepared statements or proper escaping
The environment is affected if it runs SourceCodester Pharmacy Sales and Inventory System version 1.0 and the ajax.php file processes the ID parameter from the delete_receiving action without prepared statements or parameter binding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all database operations, apply proper input validation and sanitization on the ID parameter, and ensure the database user follows least-privilege principles.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7127 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7127 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data