SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2026-71287

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-08-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click 14 days old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cacti's sanitize_sql_column (lib/functions.php) sanitizes user-supplied ORDER BY column names using the regex . Because this allowlist retains letters, digits, underscore, parentheses, and dot (intended to support expressions like COUNT(id) and table.column), a payload such as passes through completely unmodified.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cacti's sanitize_sql_column function in lib/functions.php uses an overly permissive allowlist regex to sanitize ORDER BY column names, retaining letters, digits, underscores, parentheses, and dots. This allows SQL injection payloads to pass through unmodified, enabling attackers to manipulate SQL queries via the ORDER BY parameter.

MitigationTighten the allowlist regex in sanitize_sql_column to restrict special characters, or implement additional input validation/sanitization layers to prevent SQL injection while preserving support for legitimate expressions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Cacti installation exists
    Locate the Cacti web application directory, typically at /var/www/html/cacti or C:\inetpub\wwwroot\cacti on Windows. Verify the presence of the main Cacti files such as index.php and the lib/ directory.
    Affected if Cacti is not installed on this system, the CVE does not apply.
  2. Identify installed Cacti version
    Open the file include/global.php or check the version displayed in the Cacti web interface footer. Alternatively, look for a VERSION file in the Cacti root directory.
    Affected if The installed version predates the fix for CVE-2026-71287 and the allowlist regex remains permissive.
  3. Locate the sanitize_sql_column function
    Open lib/functions.php in a text editor and search for the function definition 'function sanitize_sql_column'. Examine the allowlist regex pattern used within the function.
    Affected if The regex pattern contains characters such as parentheses () or dots . within the allowed character class, indicating an overly permissive allowlist.
  4. Verify ORDER BY parameter handling uses sanitize_sql_column
    Search the Cacti source code for calls to sanitize_sql_column that process ORDER BY parameters. Look for code patterns where user-supplied ORDER BY input flows through this function.
    Affected if The application uses sanitize_sql_column to sanitize ORDER BY column names and the regex is permissive.
  5. Check if remote access to ORDER BY functionality is enabled
    Determine whether the Cacti web interface is accessible to untrusted users or if API endpoints that accept ORDER BY parameters are exposed.
    Affected if The vulnerable code path is reachable by unauthenticated or low-privilege users who can supply ORDER BY parameters.

The environment is affected if Cacti is installed, the version contains the vulnerable sanitize_sql_column function with a permissive allowlist regex, and ORDER BY parameters can be supplied by users to reach this function.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Tighten the allowlist regex in sanitize_sql_column to restrict special characters, or implement additional input validation/sanitization layers to prevent SQL injection while preserving support for legitimate expressions.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,900
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-71287 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-71287 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data