CVE-2026-7131
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in code-projects Online Lot Reservation System up to 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /loginuser.php. The manipulation of the argument email/password leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the Online Lot Reservation System v1.0 login form (/loginuser.php). The email and password parameters accept unsanitized user input that is directly concatenated into SQL queries, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL code to bypass authentication or extract sensitive data from the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the Online Lot Reservation System is installedLocate the application web root directory and identify if the installed software is Online Lot Reservation System version 1.0Affected if The application is Online Lot Reservation System v1.0
-
Verify loginuser.php existsCheck for the presence of the file /loginuser.php in the web application root directoryAffected if The file loginuser.php exists and handles user authentication
-
Inspect the loginuser.php source codeOpen loginuser.php and examine how the email and password parameters are handled in SQL queriesAffected if The code contains SQL query strings with direct variable interpolation for email or password fields
-
Check for unsanitized input in SQL queriesLook for patterns like 'SELECT * FROM ... WHERE email='.$email or similar direct concatenation of user input into SQL statementsAffected if User input from $_POST['email'] or $_POST['password'] is directly concatenated into SQL queries without sanitization or parameterization
-
Confirm prepared statements are not usedSearch for the absence of PDO::prepare, mysqli_prepare, or similar parameterized query functions in the authentication logicAffected if The login function uses plain query execution with string concatenation instead of prepared statements
If the system runs Online Lot Reservation System v1.0 and loginuser.php directly concatenates email/password input into SQL queries without prepared statements, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2026-7131.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (PDO prepared statements) in loginuser.php for both email and password fields. Implement strict input validation and apply principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7131 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7131 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data