CVE-2026-7143
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in 1000 Projects Portfolio Management System MCA up to 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/block_status.php. The manipulation of the argument q leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the /admin/block_status.php file of the 1000 Projects Portfolio Management System allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL queries via the 'q' parameter. The exploit is publicly available, increasing exploitation risk.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the vulnerable PHP fileCheck if the file /admin/block_status.php exists in the web root directory of the 1000 Projects Portfolio Management System installationAffected if The file exists and is accessible via the web server
-
Identify installed versionCheck version.php, changelog, or any version metadata file in the application root directory. Compare the version number against the affected range (note: no specific version range was provided, so any unpatched version is potentially vulnerable)Affected if The installed version does not have the SQL injection fix applied to the block_status.php file
-
Verify admin endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access http://[target]/admin/block_status.php via HTTP request. A valid response (200 OK) indicates the endpoint is reachableAffected if The admin panel and block_status.php are accessible without authentication or with valid admin credentials
-
Confirm parameter handling vulnerabilityInspect the source code of block_status.php. Look for direct insertion of the 'q' parameter into SQL queries without prepared statements, parameter binding, or input sanitizationAffected if The 'q' parameter is used directly in SQL queries without parameterization or proper escaping
-
Test parameter injection potentialSend a crafted request with SQL injection payload in the 'q' parameter, such as: /admin/block_status.php?q=' OR '1'='1. Analyze the response for SQL errors or unexpected behavior indicating injection vulnerabilityAffected if The application returns SQL error messages or displays data inconsistent with the input, confirming injection capability
A user is affected if the 1000 Projects Portfolio Management System is installed, the /admin/block_status.php file exists, and the 'q' parameter accepts unsanitized SQL input without prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements or parameterized queries for all database operations, especially on the 'q' parameter. Additionally, apply input validation and consider deploying a WAF rule to block SQL injection attempts as an interim measure.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7143 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7143 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data