Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2026-7167

MEDIUM · 6.9 CVSS v4.0 Published 2026-06-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The vulnerability arises when the system fails to properly validate the 'email' field during the authentication process, allowing unverified or fake email addresses to be accepted. This lack of validation enables the creation of user accounts with fake email addresses, facilitating the mass creation of fraudulent accounts. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an authenticated attacker to carry out various attacks, such as mass spam distribution, system abuse, or bypassing user controls, thereby compromising the security and integrity of the system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The application fails to validate email address format and authenticity during user registration or authentication, allowing attackers to submit arbitrary strings as email addresses. This enables mass creation of fraudulent accounts that can be leveraged for spam distribution and system abuse.

MitigationImplement robust email validation including format verification (RFC-compliant regex) and optionally email verification through confirmation links or DNS MX record checks to ensure provided addresses are legitimate.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Test registration endpoint with malformed email addresses
    Submit a registration request using non-email strings such as 'test', 'test@', '@test.com', 'test@invalid', or strings containing special characters. Observe whether the application accepts the submission without rejecting it.
    Affected if The application accepts malformed email strings and creates an account without returning validation errors.
  2. Inspect email validation code in the registration module
    Review the backend code responsible for user registration or authentication. Locate any functions or methods that process the email input field and check for validation logic (e.g., regex patterns, format checking functions).
    Affected if No email format validation code exists, or the validation function is missing, commented out, or bypassed.
  3. Check for email verification configuration
    Examine application configuration files, settings, or database tables related to user account verification. Determine whether email verification (sending confirmation links) is enabled or enforced.
    Affected if Email verification is disabled or optional and not enforced upon registration.
  4. Review input validation libraries or middleware
    Look at the application's dependencies, libraries, or middleware that handle input validation. Identify whether a dedicated email validation library is in use and whether it is properly invoked during registration.
    Affected if No email-specific validation library is integrated into the registration flow.
  5. Audit existing user accounts for invalid email patterns
    Query the user database or user table for accounts with email addresses that do not conform to standard format (missing @ symbol, missing domain, contains spaces, uses IP addresses instead of domains).
    Affected if The database contains multiple user accounts with malformed or obviously fake email addresses.

Your environment is affected if the registration endpoint accepts arbitrary strings as email input without validation and does not enforce email verification for new accounts.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement robust email validation including format verification (RFC-compliant regex) and optionally email verification through confirmation links or DNS MX record checks to ensure provided addresses are legitimate.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7167 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7167 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data