CVE-2026-7223
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in BigSweetPotatoStudio HyperChat up to 2.0.0-alpha.63. Affected by this issue is the function fetch of the file packages/core/src/http/aiProxyMiddleware.mts of the component AI Proxy Middleware. Such manipulation of the argument baseurl leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceServer-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the AI Proxy Middleware's fetch function where the baseurl parameter is not properly validated, allowing attackers to make the server request arbitrary URLs including internal services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AI Proxy Middleware installationSearch for packages or modules named 'ai-proxy-middleware' or similar in your dependency files, package managers, or installed modules listAffected if The AI Proxy Middleware package is present in your environment
-
Check middleware versionRun a command to display the installed version of the AI Proxy Middleware package, such as 'npm list ai-proxy-middleware' or your package manager's version query commandAffected if The installed version falls within any affected version range or is an unpatched release
-
Verify fetch function is exposedInspect your application code, API routes, or middleware configuration to determine if the fetch function from AI Proxy Middleware is exposed via an endpoint or used in request handlingAffected if The fetch function is accessible through an API endpoint or request handler that accepts user input
-
Inspect baseurl parameter handlingReview the code that processes the baseurl parameter in the fetch function call. Look for input validation, allowlists, or sanitization logic applied to this parameterAffected if There is no strict allowlist-based validation on the baseurl parameter or validation is missing entirely
-
Check outbound network restrictionsReview your firewall rules, network policies, or server configuration to determine if outbound connections from the server are restricted to internal servicesAffected if Outbound network connections are not restricted, allowing potential access to internal infrastructure
You are affected if the AI Proxy Middleware is installed with an unpatched version and its fetch function is exposed without strict allowlist validation on the baseurl parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and allowlist for the baseurl parameter to restrict requests to trusted domains/patterns, combined with network segmentation to prevent access to internal resources.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7223 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7223 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data