CVE-2026-7225
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System 1.0. This vulnerability affects the function delete_menu of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=delete_menu. Executing a manipulation of the argument ID can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the ID parameter in the delete_menu function at /admin/ajax.php?action=delete_menu. The application fails to sanitize user input before using it in SQL queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Pizzafy Ecommerce System installationLocate the application files - typically in the web server root directory. Look for files with 'pizza', 'ecommerce', or 'SourceCodester' naming.Affected if The application source code is present on the server
-
Verify application version is 1.0Check for a version file, readme, or any version declaration in the codebase. Compare against the affected version 1.0.Affected if Installed version matches 1.0 exactly
-
Confirm vulnerable endpoint existsLocate and inspect the file /admin/ajax.php in the web root. Verify the 'action=delete_menu' parameter handling exists.Affected if The file /admin/ajax.php with delete_menu action handler is present and accessible
-
Check if ID parameter handling lacks sanitizationExamine the delete_menu function code in ajax.php. Look for SQL queries that directly use the ID parameter without parameterized queries, escaping, or input validation.Affected if The code constructs SQL queries using the ID parameter without sanitization (e.g., direct string concatenation)
-
Verify remote access to admin endpointConfirm the /admin/ajax.php endpoint is accessible from the network (not restricted to localhost only).Affected if The admin endpoint is reachable over the network
If SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System version 1.0 is installed with the delete_menu function in /admin/ajax.php accessible and using unsanitized ID parameter in SQL queries, the environment is affected by CVE-2026-7225.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the delete_menu function and throughout the application. Implement input validation and least-privilege database accounts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7225 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7225 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data