CVE-2026-7226
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System 1.0. This issue affects the function login2 of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument e-mail leads to sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the login2 function of /admin/ajax.php in SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the e-mail parameter.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Pizzafy Ecommerce System installationLocate the web application files and confirm the installation is SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System version 1.0 by checking application metadata, README files, or the main index page for product identificationAffected if The installed application is SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System 1.0 and the /admin/ajax.php file exists
-
Locate the vulnerable ajax.php fileNavigate to the /admin directory in the web root and confirm ajax.php exists. Open the file and search for the 'login2' function definitionAffected if The file /admin/ajax.php exists and contains a function named 'login2' that processes user input
-
Inspect the e-mail parameter handling in login2Within the login2 function in /admin/ajax.php, examine how the 'e-mail' POST parameter is used in database queries. Look for direct string concatenation or lack of prepared statement usageAffected if The e-mail parameter is used in SQL queries without parameterized queries (prepared statements) or proper escaping
-
Confirm network accessibility of the vulnerable endpointVerify the /admin/ajax.php endpoint is reachable over the network by attempting a request to the URL (e.g., via curl or browser). Check if the login2 function can be invoked via HTTP POST to the e-mail parameterAffected if The /admin/ajax.php endpoint is accessible remotely and the login2 function can be triggered via HTTP requests containing the e-mail parameter
You are affected if you have SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System 1.0 installed with the /admin/ajax.php file containing a login2 function that processes the e-mail parameter using non-parameterized SQL queries and is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database queries handling the e-mail parameter and apply input validation to prevent SQL injection attacks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7226 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7226 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data