CVE-2026-7228
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System 1.0. The affected element is the function get_cart_count of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=get_cart_count. This manipulation of the argument ID causes sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the get_cart_count function of /admin/ajax.php?action=get_cart_count in SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System 1.0. The ID parameter passed to this function is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL queries. This is a high-severity (CVSS 7.3) remote vulnerability with publicly available exploits.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Pizzafy Ecommerce System installationLocate the web application's root directory and check for the presence of SourceCodester Pizzafy files, particularly /admin/ajax.phpAffected if The application directory contains the pizzafy or ecommerce system files from SourceCodester
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsCheck if /admin/ajax.php exists in the web rootAffected if The file /admin/ajax.php exists in the application directory
-
Identify if get_cart_count function is presentOpen /admin/ajax.php and search for the function definition 'function get_cart_count' or the code block handling 'get_cart_count' actionAffected if The file contains a get_cart_count function or action handler
-
Check ID parameter handling in get_cart_countExamine the get_cart_count function code to see if the ID parameter is used directly in SQL queries without sanitization, prepared statements, or parameterized queriesAffected if The ID parameter is concatenated directly into SQL queries without escaping, binding, or validation
-
Verify application versionCheck version.php, README, or any version file in the application root for version numberAffected if The installed version is 1.0 or falls within the affected range for this product
The environment is affected if the SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System 1.0 is installed, the /admin/ajax.php file contains a get_cart_count function that uses the ID parameter in unsanitized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database queries in the vulnerable function, apply proper input validation and sanitization on the ID parameter, and consider deploying a WAF rule as a temporary measure until the code fix is applied.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7228 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7228 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data