CVE-2026-7264
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System 1.0. Impacted is the function get_cart_items of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=get_cart_items. Executing a manipulation of the argument ID can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System 1.0's /admin/ajax.php script. The get_cart_items function fails to properly sanitize the ID parameter before using it in an SQL query, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Pizzafy Ecommerce System installationIdentify if SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System is installed in your environment by locating its web root files or checking application metadataAffected if The application is SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System
-
Verify version is 1.0Locate and inspect version files (such as version.php, README, or config files) in the application root to determine the installed versionAffected if Version is 1.0
-
Locate vulnerable ajax.php fileCheck for the existence of /admin/ajax.php in the web root directoryAffected if The file /admin/ajax.php exists and belongs to Pizzafy Ecommerce System 1.0
-
Inspect get_cart_items function for SQL injection flawOpen /admin/ajax.php and locate the get_cart_items function. Examine how the ID parameter is handled - look for direct string concatenation in the SQL query rather than prepared statements or parameter bindingAffected if The get_cart_items function uses the ID parameter directly in an SQL query without sanitization or parameterized queries
-
Confirm admin endpoint accessibilityVerify that the /admin/ajax.php endpoint is accessible (either without authentication or with standard admin credentials)Affected if The admin ajax.php endpoint is accessible without additional access controls beyond standard admin authentication
Your environment is affected if you are running SourceCodester Pizzafy Ecommerce System version 1.0 and the /admin/ajax.php file contains the get_cart_items function that uses the ID parameter in unsanitized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace direct string concatenation in SQL queries with prepared statements/parameterized queries. Implement proper input validation on the ID parameter and apply least-privilege access controls to admin endpoints.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7264 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7264 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data