Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2026-7398

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A weakness has been identified in florensiawidjaja BioinfoMCP up to 7ada7918b9e515604d3c0ae264d3a9af10bf6e54. This vulnerability affects the function Upload of the file bioinfo_mcp_platform/app.py of the component Upload Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument Name causes path traversal. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Path traversal vulnerability in the file upload endpoint of BioinfoMCP. The 'Name' parameter in the Upload function of bioinfo_mcp_platform/app.py is not properly validated, allowing attackers to manipulate file paths using '..' sequences to write files outside the intended upload directory.

MitigationImplement strict input validation on the 'Name' parameter to reject path traversal sequences ('..') and restrict filenames to only allow safe characters. Additionally, enforce that uploaded files are stored within a designated secure directory with proper access controls.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify BioinfoMCP version
    Locate the bioinfo_mcp_platform installation and check for version information in package metadata, setup files, or version constants. Compare your installed version to the affected range.
    Affected if Your version is within an affected range or is an unpatched version of BioinfoMCP.
  2. Locate the Upload function in app.py
    Find the file bioinfo_mcp_platform/app.py and locate the Upload function definition. Confirm it accepts a 'Name' parameter.
    Affected if The Upload function with a 'Name' parameter exists in your installation.
  3. Determine if the upload endpoint is exposed
    Check the application's routing or URL configuration to see if the Upload function is exposed as an accessible HTTP endpoint.
    Affected if The file upload endpoint is reachable over the network.
  4. Inspect Name parameter validation
    Examine the Upload function code to determine whether the 'Name' parameter is validated. Specifically look for code that filters or rejects path traversal sequences like '..'.
    Affected if No validation logic blocks '..' or similar path traversal sequences in the 'Name' parameter.
  5. Verify upload directory restrictions
    Check the application configuration and upload handling code to see if uploaded files are restricted to a specific directory with proper access controls.
    Affected if Files can be written outside the intended upload directory due to missing restrictions.

You are affected if BioinfoMCP is running with the Upload function exposed and the 'Name' parameter lacks validation to block path traversal sequences, allowing files to be written outside the intended directory.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation on the 'Name' parameter to reject path traversal sequences ('..') and restrict filenames to only allow safe characters. Additionally, enforce that uploaded files are stored within a designated secure directory with proper access controls.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7398 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7398 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data